Drop that mouse and put your hands up!

by Mathew on February 12, 2008 · 9 comments

According to The Times, a draft bill — known as a “green paper” — is being circulated in Britain recommending that Internet service providers become a kind of police force for copyrighted content, with anyone who shares such content illegally automatically subject to a “three strikes and you’re out” rule. After two warnings, the draft legislation says, they would have their Internet access cut off.

There are a couple of obvious problems with this idea. For one thing, it isn’t likely to stop serious downloaders at all. As Stan Schroeder suggests in his post at Mashable, there are any number of ways around the filters that ISPs might use to detect such illegal activity — including anonymous proxies, steganography and so on. Would all of those things become illegal as well? And how many illegal files would you have to share before you got the warning from your provider — one, 10, a thousand?

As Mike Masnick notes at Techdirt, this is hardly the first time this idea has come up. Not only did U2′s manager Paul McGuinness effectively come out and demand recently that ISPs police the Internet, but the French government has been considering legislation similar to that proposed by the UK green paper. But there has been very little discussion of whether such a move would even work, let alone whether it is advisable. I would argue that the answer is no in both cases.

Not only would turning ISPs into Internet police open up a giant can of worms — would they be filtering for hate speech or disturbing images or potential anti-government sentiments as well? — but criminalizing copyright infringement on such a massive scale is just wrong. It’s all out of proportion with the damage that is allegedly being inflicted. What we are seeing is the evolution of the content business, not a worldwide crime spree that needs draconian legislation.

  • http://scrawledinwax.com scrawledinwax

    It would also set a terrible precedent for North America where companies like Time-Warner and Rogers are simultaneously ISPs and content providers. Centralising both the distribution and policing of content doesn't seem like such a great idea.

  • Chris

    A green paper is a draft consultation document, not a draft bill, although it may be in the form of a proposal. I'm not saying they're not dumb enough to do this, but the stage at which the ISPs and everyone else point out that it's a daft idea is after they've got the green paper and during the consultation phase. There's still more stages after that before it gets near legislation.

  • http://www.mathewingram.com/work mathewi

    Thanks for the clarification, Chris.

  • Pingback: UK to force ISPs into the role of bit police

  • http://socialsoul.co.uk Matt Harwood

    30-40 million people are estimated to download music “illegally” in the UK. We have a population of 60.7 million people.

    Something tells me ISP's don't want to lose 30-40 million monthly-paying customers.

    Oh, and if this comes anywhere near legislation (which I doubt so), it would amount to restriction of information in my eyes, contradicting EU law. Couple this with all the other privacy and freedom violations of the current government, I will not be giving them a single penny from there on in through taxes.

  • Pingback: Cut off for copyright « Social Media + the CIA

  • Gunnar

    Personally, I'm pretty upset by this (and similar efforts) and it goes on and on and on. Here's one of many posts from a friend that have followed this closely for over 10 years: http://www.mediafuturist.com/2008/02/welcome-to

  • http://friendfeed.com/gunnarostergren Gunnar Östergren

    Personally, I'm pretty upset by this (and similar efforts) and it goes on and on and on. Here's one of many posts from a friend that have followed this closely for over 10 years: http://www.mediafuturist.com/2008/02/welcome-to

  • Pingback: Virgin volunteers to be Big Brother - mathewingram.com/work

Older post:

Newer post: