facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

I’ll admit it — I’ve kind of missed Nick Carr, and his dyspeptic blog Rough Type. After he started on his latest book, he went on a blogging hiatus, and I kind of missed reading his fulminations on a variety of things, most of which I instinctively disagreed with. I think he may have spent too long away from the blogosphere, however, encased in that 16th-century form of blogging known as “books.” Either that or the topic of his new book, which appears to be how the Internet is dumbing us down (Carr and Andrew Keen are kind of a matched set) has taken hold of him and he now believes the internet is a kind of pernicious force in people’s lives.

His latest column is about how he has come to believe — or is close to believing — that links are bad. To be fair, his argument is a little more nuanced than that. He says that links are cognitive overhead, in the sense that they distract readers, even if they don’t follow them:

Sometimes, they’re big distractions – we click on a link, then another, then another, and pretty soon we’ve forgotten what we’d started out to do or to read. Other times, they’re tiny distractions, little textual gnats buzzing around your head. Even if you don’t click on a link, your eyes notice it, and your frontal cortex has to fire up a bunch of neurons to decide whether to click or not.

But you don’t have to take my word for it — you can go and read Nick’s argument yourself, because I have helpfully provided a link to it. You don’t have to click it if you don’t want to (possibly because you trust me to give you a fair representation of it), and you can click and open it in a tab to read later if you like, which I often do as I read things. The important thing is that I linked to it. I can also link to other things that might help you interpret it, like Marshall Kirkpatrick’s piece in response to Nick.

I could also link to a piece by Fred Wilson, a web native if there ever was one, about the “power of passed links,” in which he argues that links are the currency of the web. Like Nick’s criticism of links, currency can get in the way in our lives as well — it not only makes our pockets heavy with change, but it warps people’s minds in all sorts of ways. And yet, we couldn’t very well do without it. But links aren’t just useful to readers — I think adding them is also an exercise in intellectual discipline for the writer.

As I mentioned to a number of other people who were discussing Nick’s piece, including Chris Anderson and Vadim Lavrusik, I think not including links (which a surprising number of web writers still don’t) is in many cases a sign of intellectual cowardice. What it says is that the writer is unprepared to have his or her ideas tested by comparing them to anyone else’s, and is hoping that no one will notice. In other cases, it’s a sign of intellectual arrogance — a sign that the writer believes these ideas sprang fully formed from his or her brain, like Athena from Zeus’s forehead, and have no link to anything that another person might have thought or written. Either way, getting rid of links is a failure on the writer’s part.

As I said in a comment on Nick’s post, I fully expect his next move will be to remove links of any kind — and then to ban comments as well, as “thinkers” such as Seth Godin have, since they just get in the way of all that pure thought. And then, perhaps, Nick will finally decide that the internet itself is rather over-rated, and will retreat to his books, where no one can argue with him. And that would be a shame, because arguing with him is such fun.

About the author

Mathew 2431 posts

I'm a Toronto-based senior writer with Fortune magazine, and my favorite things to write about are social technology, media and the evolution of online behavior

91 Responses to “Nick Carr’s Retreat From the Internet Continues”
  1. A lot of good comments. I agree with Vadim links are far more useful than distracting and it builds trust with the readers. Thanks again for the posts, great job.

  2. Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the write's unique point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those sits to knowmore relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally I feel quite well.
    http://www.wslmart.net/

  3. Does this world exist if we fell in love with the someone we should not have?Is it a joke that god and devil makes if I loved you.
    http://www.the-various.com/

  4. It was said there is a circulation of love in this world, the only thing can be seen is the beginning but no ending. Someone wants to make a start whereas someone wants to finish. It is all like that.
    http://www.the-various.com/

  5. […] in the past, predictably caught some flak for his post too, including from Mathew Ingram, who argued that links are at least as much an intellectual discipline for the writer as the reader. The […]

  6. […] May 31 Mathew Ingram does a great job puncturing gasbag Nick Carr in Nick Carr’s Retreat From the Internet Continues. […]

  7. I agree with you mat, anyway thanks for the links reference. Sometimes links could kill your web.

  8. Thanks … this post is really nice and useful

    Any Question
    Free eBooks download

  9. […] providing links has gone from handy addition to requirement when advancing an argument online. As Mathew Ingram put it in a post critical of Carr, “I think not including links (which a surprising number of web […]

  10. Well what i think is upto certain extent the designing is perfect.I read your whole content and i tried to get to its final extent about the links you posted.That so cool that you retreat your self.

    real estate websites miami

  11. nice
    great share

  12. Man this is really an active blog, you have a lot of people commenting and visiting your site. Congratulations! By the way, DisQus ROCKS the SOCKS out of WordPress original comment syste, thanks for having this plug-in installed :) Unfortunately I do not know Nick Carr, but this blog post enlightened me a little bit, hehe

  13. […] providing links has gone from handy addition to requirement when advancing an argument online. As Mathew Ingram put it in a post critical of Carr, “I think not including links (which a surprising number of web […]

  14. “I fully expect his next move will be to remove links of any kind — and then to ban comments as well” – a straw man argument. You read what you'd like to argue against, not what he actually wrote.

  15. i think that this is good site and After he started on his latest book, he went on a blogging hiatus

  16. hitvie

  17. Hhe article's content rich variety which make us move for our mood after reading this article. surprise, here you will find what you want! Recently, I found some wedsites which commodity is colorful of fashion. Such as xxxxxxxx that worth you to see. Believe me these websites won’t let you down.
    http://www.nikemaxsale.com
    http://www.imogen-heap.com

  18. […] Nick Carr’s post on “delinkification” Laura Miller’s review of “The Shallows” Mathew Ingram defends linking […]

  19. Today technology is developing day by day and i think it has been very nice to know this. I agree that designing really attracts but yeah it is very important that it must be very user friendly too. I had read this whole article and i really impressed with it's content. It's probably true that a growing percentage of readers will simply open the links in new tabs and go to them afterward.

  20. But how this happen i can't understand that's why i share this info with my friends .
    Thanks.

  21. In order to continue to expand the time people spend online, Google and other Internet companies have to make the Net feel like a safe

  22. […] in the past, predictably caught some flak for his post too, including from Mathew Ingram, who argued that links are at least as much an intellectual discipline for the writer as the reader. The […]

  23. […] by ReadWriteWeb in The Case Against Links, and more critically by Matthew Ingram, who ponders Nick Carr’s Retreat From the Internet. I’m of two minds on this. it strikes me that in some types of posts, links are best used […]

  24. […] Plenty of other people have commented on other elements of his post, and I don’t want to repeat them. To be fair, his position is much more nuanced and complete than the snippet I quoted may make it seem – after all, he’s written books about it, as well as a more detailed look at his wider thesis. I don’t really want to get into that argument. Instead, I want to tease out yet another interpretation of the function of the hyperlink – two, in fact. […]

  25. […] and Ryan Chittum in a piece for the Columbia Journalism Review (in the spirit of full disclosure, I wrote about Carr’s argument on my personal […]

  26. […] and Ryan Chittum in a piece for the Columbia Journalism Review (in the spirit of full disclosure, I wrote about Carr’s argument on my personal […]

Comments are closed.