Online ads: It’s called a flight to quality

There’s much sturm und drang about online advertising, and whether it’s in a big hole or a *really* big hole. Judging by the graphic of a giant smoking crater he used for his post, Peter Kafka at All Things D apparently falls into the latter camp, and he also quotes Nick “The Dark Lord” Denton as saying that anyone who doesn’t expect ad rates to fall 40 per cent is an idiot (although, to his credit, Peter does note that Denton is always saying things like that). But one of the reports that everyone is using for fodder, which comes from the Rubicon Project, isn’t that bleak at all.

If anything, in fact, the Rubicon report indicates that online advertising is still growing relatively strongly despite the turmoil in credit markets and the slump in stock prices, and could even benefit as advertisers look for more quantifiable results for their spending, which online ads provide. The report also says that while overall ad rates tracked by the network dropped 11 per cent in the quarter:

“performance varied by network type and channel. Several channels experienced greater than 25 per cent lift in CPMs from Q2, while others dropped by almost 20 per cent.”

To me, that sounds a lot like a flight to quality, which is hardly surprising. Until recently, I think a lot of companies were basically throwing money wherever they could online, regardless of the quality of the ad network or the sites involved, and regardless of whether using banners or pop-ups made any sense or not. Perhaps now they are being a bit more choosy when it comes to spending their money online. Rubicon also notes that in the “news and reference sites” category, ad rates outperformed just about any other market, with CPMs up by 36 per cent.

Before everyone starts berating me for taking Rubicon’s word for it, I realize the company is an “ad-network optimization” service, and therefore has a vested interest in showing that online ads are growing. But at the same time, the data it is using come from more than 270 ad networks and about 30 billion impressions, which at least gives them some claim to valid information on what rates are actually doing. And J.P. Morgan says it sees online ads continuing to grow as well, just not as quickly.

6 thoughts on “Online ads: It’s called a flight to quality

  1. Pingback: HipMojo.com » NBC’s Kliavkoff Latest Digital Media Executive to Look for Greener Pastures

  2. Pingback: First comes layoffs, then comes ad budget cuts | The Andrew Hillman Blog

  3. Pingback: It Is Darwinism in Online Advertising, Not Decline | Profy | Internet news and commentary

  4. I've love to think that companies actually started to use the real power of the 'net to market to the right people for once. I mean, it'd be nice to actually see information for stuff I care about over the crap the I don't. How about advertising with a rating system included, sort of like YouTube? Except I'd want a category for the actual product as well as the ad itself. So if I think the ad is hilarious but the product doesn't interest me, I could give the ad a thumbs up but the product a thumbs down. Not only would I be more likely to see stuff I'd care about, advertisers would get that critical feedback they need. And maybe stop producing ads that suck.

  5. I've love to think that companies actually started to use the real power of the 'net to market to the right people for once. I mean, it'd be nice to actually see information for stuff I care about over the crap the I don't. How about advertising with a rating system included, sort of like YouTube? Except I'd want a category for the actual product as well as the ad itself. So if I think the ad is hilarious but the product doesn't interest me, I could give the ad a thumbs up but the product a thumbs down. Not only would I be more likely to see stuff I'd care about, advertisers would get that critical feedback they need. And maybe stop producing ads that suck.

  6. Pingback: This is adverising accoutability | Telling all All

Comments are closed.