The market bloodbath: Some perspective

I don’t write about the stock market much any more — mostly because I wrote about it every day for about 15 years and kind of got sick of it, to tell you the honest truth — but today was one of those days where it’s hard to pay attention to anything else. Like many people, I spent much of the day hitting the refresh button on my browser to see how low the Dow and the Toronto stock indexes were going to go. I never imagined that some day I would watch the TSX come within a hair of a 1,000-point drop in a single day, or the Dow plummet more than 750 points.

On days like today, it’s tempting to use terms like “bloodbath” and “catastrophe,” and all those muscular-sounding adjectives that headline writers use to really pump up the hype, and plenty of media outlets were doing just that. Others were trumpeting the fact that this was the biggest-ever drop on the Dow and other indexes — but of course, that only applies if you’re looking at the number of points that they fell. If you look at it in terms of the market’s percentage decline, then it was definitely a bad day, but a long way from the worst ever. In 1987, the Dow fell by more than 23 per cent, while yesterday it fell by less than 7 per cent.

As a friend pointed out, the drop today — which came after a proposed Wall Street bailout package failed to make it through Congress — was also roughly equivalent to the amount the Dow climbed two weeks ago, when the $700-billion bailout was first announced. A number of people noted that the drop today obliterated all the gains of the last eight years, but of course that measures from close to the peak of the dot-com bubble. If you start measuring from the bottom of that precipice (which came in 2002) the market is still up by almost 3,000 points or about 40 per cent.

I’m not trying to play Pollyanna here. The financial meltdown that the U.S. has seen over just the past couple of weeks is unprecedented, and in many ways it makes previous government-led bailouts such as the Long-term Capital Management crisis in 1998 (which was also caused by overly optimistic risk-assessment models coupled with rampant greed) look like a kid’s birthday party by comparison (Mike Masnick at Techdirt has a great all-around background post). We are going to be seeing the unwinding of those bloody entrails for some time, and it’s not going to be pretty. But pouring gasoline on the fire of panic isn’t really helping.

6 thoughts on “The market bloodbath: Some perspective

  1. Pingback: Why Apple Might As Well Be A Bank: We’re All On The Same Boat Together « SmoothSpan Blog

  2. Pingback: Howard Lindzon » All Bets Are Off...

  3. I agree with that in percentage terms it wasn't that impressive but all the same approximately 1.2 trillion dollars was wiped off the market value. Double the amount of the bailout that failed to pass. From what I understand its the first-ever trillion-dollar one-day loss. Crazy times indeed

  4. Had they let Long Term Capital fail in 1998 like they should have, the Fed wouldn't have helped set the stage for where we are today….

  5. Thanks for sharing your insight. Right now I'm using my intuition and going with a stock that I believe is heading in the right direction. I'm looking at a company called Mentor Capital with a stake in a biotech company that has a promising new breast cancer treatment in clinical trials that trumps existing treatments. I believe the stock will do well once it hits the market according to the info released about it at

Comments are closed.