Podtech failure: Scoble’s lessons

by Mathew on July 17, 2008 · Comments

Not long ago, Podtech was a video company with a bright future — or at least so it appeared. Run by John Furrier, with some high-profile social media types like Jeremiah Owyang and Robert Scoble on board, the company had high hopes of being a new video-content provider. And then the train left the track at some point, and now the company’s assets (whatever’s left) have been sold for just $500,000. Owyang left to join Forrester and Scoble left to go to FastCompany, and John Furrier was effectively forced to resign. So what happened? How did $7.5-million worth of VC money get vaporized so quickly?

We may never know the complete answer to those questions, until someone like John chooses to talk about it (Update: He has posted a comment on FriendFeed), but we can draw some tentative conclusions from what Robert Scoble has said on FriendFeed. Among other things, he says:

“Podtech was screwed up by a number of decisions. Everyone played a part, but I sure learned a lot about how a company can screw up big time. Major learnings for me? 1. Have a story. 2. Have everyone on board with that story. 3. If anyone goes off of that story, make sure they get on board immediately or fire them. PodTech did none of the three and I’m sorry for my part in not making the three happen.”

And then, apparently unable to resist adding more details, he says:

“Other things I learned: 1. Make sure people are judged by the revenues they bring in. Those that bring in revenues should get to run the place. People who don’t bring in revenues should get fewer and fewer responsibilities, not more and more. 2. Work ONLY for a leader who will make the tough decisions (see above). 3. Build a place where excellence is expected, allowed, and is enabled. 4. Fire idiots quickly (didn’t happen at PodTech — even if you count me as one of the idiots)”

And finally:

“Other things I learned: 1. if your engineering team can’t give a media team good measurements, the entire company is in trouble. Only things that are measured ever get improved. 2. When your stars aren’t listened to the company is in trouble. 3. When your stars start leaving (Gillmor and Owyang left before I did) the company is in trouble. 4. Getting rid of the CEO, even if it’s all his fault, won’t help unless you replace him/her with someone who is visionary and who can fix #1,2,3″

But there are some things not even Scoble will blab, apparently:

“Much of the worst stuff is too personal. Failures of companies often happen around failures at the leadership level. Telling why things failed means telling off investors, executives, and others (and even me). Not likely to happen because that’d mean burning bridges and I’m just not willing to do that. These people have too many friends. :-)”

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • fakescoble
    Scoble is such a joke. He's talent. He must have read that in some business book.

    I want to hear from the VCs and the founder
  • antje
    1. Make sure people are judged by the revenues they bring in. Those that bring in revenues should get to run the place. People who don’t bring in revenues should get fewer and fewer responsibilities, not more and more.

    assuming their job is to bring revenue.... :)

    I'm curious what measurables he means here: 1. if your engineering team can’t give a media team good measurements, the entire company is in trouble (metrics?)
  • anon
    Is anyone at Fastcompany Inc. reading this? What has Scoble really learned?

    What is Fastcompany.tv's story? How do Fastcompany.com, scobleizer.com, scobleizerTV, Fast Company Live, WorkFastTV, PhotoCycle, Qik, Kyte, Twitter, and FriendFeed/scobleizer all fit into that story? If you need a hint, read the about page.

    How much revenue is Fastcompany.tv making? How much profit. What is the project revenue growth for the rest of the year?

    What is being measured at Fastcompany.tv? It doesn't know much about it's audience. There is no way to login, share demographic info, etc.

    Who is making the tough decisions at Fastcompany.tv? Why did it take a threat from SAP to fire Shel? There doesn't seem to be any strong editoral decisions or guidelines.
  • These are all great points by Robert.
  • Re: "Fire idiots quickly" It's not that I think one shouldn't fire idiots (although I personally try not to hire idiots in the first place) but if one is trying to build "a place where excellence is expected, allowed, and is enabled" being the tough decision maker (vs. inspiring leader), rewarding only revenue (vs. rewarding success/innovation) and firing people (vs. supporting them in a constructive manner to help them succeed) is the way NOT to have that happen - particularly in the digital space where innovation and experimentation means the necessity of the freedom to fail.
  • Now there is good deal. Buy just about any Mac and get a free itouch or ipod nano. I believe they are doing this since they have the new 3g iphones coming in, but still a good deal anyways.To know more about this please visit http://simplisticthoughts.com/category/linux-an....
  • DC Crowley
    Scoble is passionate and honest... even if he may or may not be right. He wanted it to work. I did a compare a while ago comparing his shows on fastcompany with Podtech. The growth was very impressive :)
  • Surprisingly good amount of (vague but) helpful points in there. Robert is a smart guy, especially when you realize that all of his insights and thoughts go from gestation to broadcast in about .043 seconds.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: