Social networks
The “Twitter ain’t all that” backlash
In the wake of blog posts and news articles about the use of Twitter during the earthquake in China (including one by me), there has been a fairly predictable backlash response — about how Twitter is just one of many tools that people can use to stay updated on news events, that it gets more attention because the “digerati” are enamored with it, and that the praise for Twitter is largely overdone. You can see aspects of these arguments in comments from Eric Rice on my post (as well as here), and in a recent post by Kaiser Kuo of Ogilvy’s Digital Watch.
All of these criticisms have some validity to them. Plenty of people have stayed informed about the Virginia Tech shootings or the tsunamis in Indonesia or similar events by using cellphone text messages, Facebook posts, Wikipedia entries and even the good old radio. I don’t think anyone is saying — as Kaiser puts it at the end of his post — that this episode saw Twitter “drive a nail in the coffin of traditional media.” If anyone is saying that, then they are stupid or being inflammatory. The point is not that anything is driving a nail into something else; it’s that new tools are emerging that can be used to some benefit.
No one is suggesting that Twitter replace the emergency broadcast system, or that Twitterers should be thought of in the same breath as “first responders” such as search & rescue personnel, which is what Eric seems concerned about. That’s ridiculous. But why shouldn’t we talk about how Twitter can be used to get information out about disasters? Kaiser Kuo himself spends much of his post talking about how Twitter “proved very useful as a means of quickly disseminating information gleaned from the mainstream media on the scene,” and how the broadcast nature of the service “made it better than simple IM.”
That’s the point, not whether Twitter is better than something else, or replacing something else, or the best thing ever.
Related posts:
On FriendFeed, this post was liked by 0 people and commented on 0 times show
license
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.
subscribe
grazr
TwitterCount
busted tees
Discussion
for “The “Twitter ain’t all that” backlash”
hmm you are all so obsessed maybe I should give it another try. Who do you follow Mathew and how do you keep up with the conversations? they seem like I entered the twilight zone .... or inside someone' s head (even scarier)
Well, I follow a lot of my friends and colleagues, obviously -- like
@rhh and @stuartma, as well as people I know like @pkedrosky, and then
I also follow some interesting people like @fimoculous and
@craignewmark and @QueenofSpain. And when I see someone I know and
respect sending @ messages to other people, sometimes I go and follow
them too.
ok but more importantly, how do you follow the conversations? Do you go to twitter site and just read and try to figure out the list of threads? I mean the design hurts my eyes :) but it'[s more about trying to figure who's responding to @someone that I don't follow that makes me have any idea what's going on.
Meaning, if you have no network, or don't follow the same people other people who are responding to other people are, how do you follow the conversations? Do you just keep adding people everyone else you follow is following?
I must admit that what you're describing is the hard part, Antje --
figuring out who is worth following and who isn't (or who someone is,
or who they are talking to) isn't so much a science as a crapshoot. I
more or less follow people at random based on whether they either know
someone I know, or based on the content of their posts -- and then I
let it sort of flow by like a river that I step in from time to time.
seems more like a good way to avoid real work... lol
You just described the Internet :-)
The earthquake was centred in China. Not Japan.
Typo: Earthquake in China, not Japan.
Damn. I hate it when that happens. Thanks to everyone who wrote in
to tell me that it was China and not Japan. That's what I get for
writing posts so late in the evening.
Obviously me called Scoble a "first responder" was a joke -- I called him the "Twitter first responder", can't you just imagine him showing up at the scene of something virtually, ready to help out?
That said, he really did provide a service I feel, and I also feel that we're going to be seeing a lot more of these types of stories (Twitter helping spread info in disasters, when someone is in jail, etc) going forward.
I agree, MG -- and I knew that "first responder" thing was a joke.
But I think you're right that Scoble (and others) did provide a
service, although it may not be on par with the search and rescue guy
who frees you from the rubble or whatever.