Is PaidContent really a “blog” at all?

by Mathew on March 28, 2008 · Comments

In a piece posted at the New York Times’ Bits blog, Saul Hansell pits Mike Arrington’s “vision of blogging’s future” against that of PaidContent founder Rafat Ali. One is personal and filled with lots of emotion (guess which one) and the other is more analytical and has more traditional journalistic integrity, at least according to PaidContent’s new CEO. Rafat quite freely admits that his model has very little to do with the rough-and-tumble of the blogosphere and more to do with the large trade publishers like Reed Elsevier and Informa, which cover industries like a blanket but don’t get into pissing matches about personalities.

I have nothing but respect for what Rafat and his team have built. He and Staci and the rest have doggedly pursued their model, and they have covered the media business within an inch of its life, and they should be congratulated for that. I think Rafat is totally right when he says he is going after the big trade publishers, and I have no doubt that one or the other of them will eventually come to their senses and just buy the operation outright, or Rafat might just buy them.

But I also find that PaidContent.org isn’t that… well, interesting. If I were a mid-level media executive, trying to figure out where the next layoffs were coming from, or who was rising up the ranks of whichever entity, then I might read it for information purposes. But it doesn’t have much in the way of colour to it — and to be fair, Rafat has never made any secret of the fact that colour isn’t what he’s after. I also notice that while PaidContent is set up like a blog, with comments and everything, there aren’t a whole lot of comments on the stories I read.

To me, however, part of the power that blogs have is that they are personal and direct, that they give you a connection of some kind to a person (or people, in the case of a blog like Gawker), and that they have a voice that either interests or amuses or enrages you. PaidContent doesn’t have that for me — it is pure information. That’s why it commands triple-digit CPM rates for its ads, no doubt. But while I wish Rafat and the rest of the team all the best, and I think they are doing a heck of a job, I hope that not all blogs are going to become just trade press in another form.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • K. Shaheedin
    "But I also find that PaidContent.org isn’t that… well, interesting..."

    oh puh-leez. if that were a description of this blog, we'd be in full agreement. but it's so wrong and simply a smear.

    i suppose if you enjoy a website where its writers call other people "wanker" and "cun*," then you know where to click. but rafat and his team have built a web site that's both informative and engaging. if you find it less than thrilling, that's your problem. but your snark is ill-considered, silly and cheap. then again, i don't expect any less from a arrington fanboy.
  • Whoa, K. -- chill out, dude. I just said I didn't find it that
    interesting. I didn't say it wasn't informative, and if you read the
    whole thing you can see that I think highly of Rafat and what he's
    been able to accomplish. I fail to see how any of that makes me an
    "Arrington fanboy."



    On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Disqus
  • Steve Safran
    Well, here we have the interesting question of "what's a blog?" followed by the more interesting "does it really matter, anyway?" PC is a blog, insofar as it constantly updates itself in the blog format, invites comments, has trackbacks and other features bloggy. So I don't see arguing that it's not a blog, simply because it lacks opinion.

    However, I think the more interesting debate is "What's a blog?" and "What does it matter?" PC uses the blog format... to deliver news. Unlike most blogs, it doesn't use news as a starting point for discussion. More news websites should be like this - they should feature a constant river of information as it happens, rather than waiting to post a finished product.

    It's my guess that MSM will adopt blog style more and more.

    Good one, Matthew.
  • Thanks, Steve -- I think you are right. PC is using the blog format
    and blog tools to deliver something that (apart from comments) is far
    more like traditional media, and that is what makes it even more of a
    threat to that same traditional media than what most people think of
    when they hear the word "blog." I'd still much rather read TechCrunch
    or Gawker though :-)



    On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Disqus
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: