Warning: bitchy Canadian telecom post

by Mathew on September 20, 2007 · Comments

It’s all well and good that our dollar officially hit parity with the U.S. greenback today, but it sure would be nice if we could get something approaching real competition in the mobile telecom market in Canada. Then maybe certain carriers who shall remain nameless — but whose names start with a B and rhyme with “hell” — wouldn’t be able to pull stuff like this.

As Tony notes, and Michael Geist also describes here, Bell is promoting a $75-a-month “unlimited” data plan that uses a wireless PC card — but it has some pretty ridiculous restrictions. Not only does it have an umbrella clause that says you can’t use your connection in a way that “consumes excessive network capacity in Bell’s reasonable opinion,” but it also tells you what you can’t do with your connection, and that includes:

“multi-media streaming, voice over Internet protocol or any other application which uses excessive network capacity that is not made available to you by Bell [or is used to] operate an email, web, news, chat or other service.”

So you can’t use it to stream video, do VOIP or even run a chat server. What the hell else are you supposed to do with it? I’m surprised they didn’t throw file-sharing in there too — but that’s probably included in the definition of a “web service.” Tony says that there are also reports that this so-called “unlimited” data plan is capped at 250 megabytes. Classic.

Alec Saunders has been down the limited/unlimited road before, and it isn’t something that is confined to Canadian carriers either, as Mike Masnick notes over at Techdirt. But still — come on.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • That is just incredible - our 'cozy little wireless oligopoly' is actually making wireless telco's devolve. Someone should write a paper on this. Reverse Darwinism in Canadian Wireless.
  • Alex Beamish
    I can almost imagine the meeting where the marketers and the engineers are arguing about this one. It turns into something from This Hour Has 22 Minutes pretty fast.

    Marketker: We can call the new plan 'unlimited!'
    Engineer: But it's not. Our subscribers will blow up our network if they try to do that.
    Marketer: Oh, that's OK, we'll put in a footnote forbidding them from doing lumpy stuff like VoIP, media streaming and stuff like that.
    Engineer: So then it's really a limited plan.
    Marketer: Yeah, but you can't sell that.
    Engineer: So you're going to sell an unlimited plan that's really a limited plan.
    Marketer: Only for people who want to use VoIP, do file sharing, media streaming, that kind of stuff.
    Engineer: But isn't that what the Internet's all about?
    Marketer: I think we're finished here.

    Unlimited plans made sense when we were limited to 56K dialup modems. Now with broadband and wireless, not so much. It's particularly galling when service providers cut off customers because they were using too much bandwidth -- but remain maddeningly vague about how much is 'too much'.

    You can probably guess that I'm an Engineer.
  • good post. I'm with Telus and for the about 100 bucks a month that I spend, I get a measly 4 mb of data... ouch. I have friends who get unlimited data for 20 bucks / month in the US. boohoo.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post: Google gets into the social swing

Newer post: Goodbye magazines, hello blog-azines