TechCrunch20 and Hammer: Can’t touch this

by Mathew on May 11, 2007 · Comments

So Mike Arrington announces some of the new advisors on the “panel of experts” for the TechCrunch20 conference that he and Jason Calacanis have started up as a kind of anti-DEMO conference. And the first thing that some people — like Ben Metcalfe and I, and Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests, for example — think when we look at the list is: What the F? MC Hammer is on this panel? What’s he an expert on?

snipshot_e412tcwkeui4.jpgBen makes some good points, I think (points whose value is only slightly decreased by the fact that he consistently misspells the name “Michael” as “Micheal”). The Hammer — or to use his real name, Stanley Kirk Durell — seems to have done very little that qualifies him for a role on a panel of Web 2.0 startup experts. Yes, he is reportedly working with a music-based startup, but is that really all it takes to get on the panel of experts? Then Nick Denton at Valleywag weighs in with the “tokenism” card, at which point Karoli lashes out at the Wag for picking on Hammer — and then Nick and Mike take shots back and forth at each other in Karoli’s comment section. Nick says Karoli has missed the whole point, and Mike says he’s race-baiting. Is he? Who knows. But one thing occurred to me while I was reading this whole sordid tale: It would be a lot easier to argue that Hammer isn’t a token black guy if he had actually accomplished anything in the last decade that justified his presence on the panel. Just saying.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Peter C
    And the latest news.. Bill Cosby at this year's FooCamp!
  • I think Fred Wilson put it best:

    "The intermingling of Hammer and the blogosphere will be HOW future generations comsume their news. Period. End of story.

    I learn stuff on Hammer's blog every day that is more profound than many of the twitter postings that I read."

    ;-)
  • A couple years ago when I was starting my first blog I stumbled upon Hammer's. It kind of surprised me since it wasn't some self-promo thing, as you might expect, but just a regular guy's page about him and his kids with pictures of them hanging out at McDonald's.
  • Mathew
    Well, maybe I've been too hard on the guy then. It wouldn't be the first time :-)
  • a few months, i was talking to a couple of friends whose opinions i really respect, who know hammer. they say he knows what's going on in the space better than most...
  • Mathew
    Sorry, Karoli -- not sure what happened to it either. Might have been eaten by the spam filter.

    As for your point about users, that's a fair point -- except that Mike and Jason are calling it an "experts panel." There's kind of a disconnect there I think.
  • Mathew, I'm not sure what happened to the comment I posted earlier, but the gist of it was this: If the focus of this conference is Web 2.0, then users should be part of the mix, don't you think? And Hammer is a blogger, gadget geek and uses multimedia mashups. Like me, his origins are not in the tech industry, but more as an end user. I can't think of a better perspective to add to the panel, personally.
  • Well, I'd say that it's finally honesty in advertising. Half the Web 2.0 stuff is marketing/advertising/advertorial or whatever under the guise of technology. Before we had all the Web 2.0 stuff, a typical business plan would be "we're going to build the best [database/word processor/'foo' server etc.] in the world and we're going to sell it to people". If the TechCrunch crowd were doing that, MC Hammer would be totally irrelevant. But they're not.

    When we're talking about YouTube - the technological component of which consists in FLV files and a server farm the size of a small town - it seems far more appropriate to have media people than tech people. I mean, what the crap do we know about advertising and music promotion or indie video? We write code and geek out with computers. A group of fourteen year-olds could club together and build their own YouTube clone in less than a month these days (and evidence suggests quite a number of them have - and then subsequently went on to found companies).

    In an age of tech startups being basically media companies in disguise, MC Hammer is a far more appropriate choice for the conference board than a techie.
  • Mathew
    No sweat, Ben. I hope you do the same for me someday -- that's what bloggers are for :-)
  • Lolcatz to me for not spell-checking my prose. I'm dyslexic, so I should know better.

    I corrected the mistakes - thanks for pointing them out :)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: