Studios sing chorus of “Blame Canada”



Michael Geist has a typically well-argued post on the latest Warner Brothers camcordering nonsense here.

Original post:

(cross-posted from my Globe and Mail blog)

When you go to see a movie, do you get irritated by the guys sitting in front of you with their video cameras pointed at the screen, illegally “camcordering” the film? I don’t, because I’ve never seen one, although I’ve been to my share of premieres, including (most recently) Spider-Man 3. And yet, Warner Brothers and Twentieth Century Fox and other Hollywood studios have been screaming and yelling for some time now about how Canada is a hotbed of piracy. In the latest move, Warner Bros. said on Tuesday that it will no longer hold preview screenings in Canada.

pirate1.jpgSo that means no more previews of Warner Bros. movies before the main attraction at your local multiplex? Well, no. The studio said that it is cancelling all “promotional and word-of-mouth” screenings. Those are the special showings that occur just before a big movie hits the theatres, which are usually open only to contest winners, movie reviewers, people who see an ad, and so on — in other words, a pretty unlikely place for someone to bring in a camcorder under their shirt. So if Warner’s move strikes you as mostly a symbolic gesture, that’s because it probably is — a gesture aimed primarily at keeping the pressure on Parliament to bring in new anti-piracy legislation.

There have been other gestures as well. Studios and movie distributors have been lobbying to have Canada placed on a high-priority international piracy “watchlist” along with countries like China and Russia. And Twentieth Century Fox made some vague threats earlier this year to hold back some of its top movies from Canadian release, because the risk of piracy was reportedly so high. One Fox executive said in January that Canadian cam-corder copies were “like an out-of-control epidemic,” and that the country had become “a leading source of worldwide Internet film piracy.” He said Canada accounted for close to 50 per cent of illegal camcorder copies.

As Ottawa law professor Dr. Michael Geist and others have pointed out before, however, there are a number of flaws in the movie studios’ argument — including the fact that there is no tangible evidence for that 50 per cent figure. The International Intellectual Property Alliance, which includes the Motion Picture Association of America, has previously said that Canada is only responsible for about 20 per cent of camcorder copies. And even though that number still seems high, the MPAA has said only 179 of the 1,400 movies released between 2004 and 2006 were camcorded (Warner says 70 per cent of its movies were camcorded over the last 18 months).

Dr. Geist notes that one of the most recent studies of movie piracy found the majority of illegally copied movies – over 75 per cent — come from review copies or early releases that are sent to movie industry insiders, including reviewers at newspapers and magazines. Piracy experts say that camcorder copies are really only in demand for that brief window between when a movie is released for preview screenings and when the DVD is released. Canada obviously has DVD copiers too, but no one is saying we are an international leader (at least not yet).

Is camcordering a movie and selling millions of copies wrong? Of course it is — and we already have laws that make that a crime, although movie studios and distributors say they are too difficult to enforce. But it doesn’t help when the industry uses hyperbole and inflated numbers to try and make its case.

Comments (3)

  1. engtech wrote::

    Such idiots.

    If they had a clue they would hire teenagers to make crappy camcorder copies of movies to distribute over the internet. Crappy cam copies are so inferior to DVD/HD-TV rips that it gives the consumer an incentive to buy the higher quality product.

    If you target the inferior pirated product, then you remove the competition to DVD/HD-TV rips. So when Joe Shmoe goes to pirate a movie he doesn’t have to sift through tons of crap cam copies to find a good release.

    Killing Napster got rid of all the inferior MP3 rips out there and pushed people to BitTorrent and piracy groups that pride themselves on releasing “as good as CD” quality rips. Now they’re doing the same thing with movies when instead they should be flooding the pirate channels with bad rips and mislabeled downloads.

    Tuesday, May 8, 2007 at 4:34 pm #
  2. Mathew wrote::

    That’s a good point, Engtech. Warner and the other studios may actually be making it worse by focusing on camcorded movies.

    Tuesday, May 8, 2007 at 4:46 pm #
  3. Rob Hyndman wrote::

    I’m not sure what’s worse – that we have to deal with this nonsense, or that our parliamentarians are so dense that they are, or are perceived to be, susceptible to it.

    Another interpretation: the MPAA doesn’t buy it for a minute, and neither does the Canadian Government – it’s a PR campaign designed to give our Govt political cover with a gullible public when it bends to the MPAA’s will.


    Tuesday, May 8, 2007 at 4:59 pm #