Weinberger’s third order of information

by Mathew on May 6, 2007 · Comments

From ALA TechSource, an online resource for librarians, comes a great review of David Weinberger’s book Everything is Miscellaneous.

“This book is dangerous. Everything is Miscellaneous takes all the precious ideas we are taught as librarians and throws them out the window. Structure, order, precise metadata, bibliographic control: gone, gone, gone, gone.

Even, for you edgier types, ye who tell of your Semantic Web and your RDF triples: old-school, good-bye, don’t let the door hit you on the way out.”

In what Weinberger describes as the “third order” of information, knowledge is no longer bound by either-or decisions, and “can be in many places at once; knowledge does not fit into finite boxes or even have a shape; and — most disturbingly, though in Weinberger’s hands, also most entertainingly — messiness is a virtue.”

Weinberger “explains this point repeatedly but no better than in a section discussing Flickr, where automated and human-supplied metadata create “a mess than gets richer in potential and more useful every day. … Third-order messes reverse entropy, becoming more meaningful as they become messier, with more relationships built in.”

As the ALA TechSource blog notes:

“The third order is most definitely not about attempting to perfect second-order rules and weld them to a third-order universe; it is not about predictive information; it is not about the primacy of accuracy over volume. The third order, in other words, is the opposite of how we do things in LibraryLand.”

In summary, says writer Karen Schneider: “This is, I repeat, a dangerous book. Ban it, burn it, or take it to heart. The most dangerous part of this book is not that Weinberger says these things, and so much more: the danger comes if we don’t listen.” Cory Doctorow has a review of the book at BoingBoing, and Cory is also the first in a series of interviews that Weinberger has done to go along with the book which are being made available as podcasts — and will include interviews with Arianna Huffington, Craig Newmark and others.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Nav
    As a literary student, this resonates in so many ways. While we once limited ourselves to 'literature proper', that has now become impossible - one simply can't look at a piece of writing outside of the multiplicity of social, historical, cultural, political and economic contexts (to make no mention of others) it is created and read in. In much the same way, 'tagging' and Web 2.0 point to the networks of systems that can frame and shape units of information.

    What is fascinating about this is that while contemporary critical theory has been talking about the impossibly overlapped, multiple nature of knowledge for than fifty years, it's only now that we have the material and technological capacity to express the literally 'web-like' character of information and its contexts that we see an actual move toward a re-imagining of how we organise and conceive of 'data'.
  • Thanks for the post: yet another book added to my lengthening reading list. This seems like a good place to start for a Library 2.0 conversation.

    Some Barcampers have been talking about organizing a LibraryCamp to bring together the web 2.0 and Information Architecture crowd with the librarians.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: