Yahoo team is teh l33t haxx0rs

by Mathew on February 15, 2007 · Comments

Boy, that team over at Yahoo is something, aren’t they? Everyone keeps saying how Yahoo is falling behind Google, and they just don’t have the mojo any more, and how their peanut butter is spread too thin or whatever (don’t ask), but someone over there must have been burning the midnight programming oil, because somehow they managed to sneak into Digg’s secret compound and steal the code for their voting system.

grab_suggestions1.gifAs described over on Yahoo’s “Yodel Anecdotal” blog (come on — could any organization whose blog has a dumb name like that really be evil?), the company has added Digg-style voting for what amount to online suggestion boxes on many of their sites, including their auto hub, real estate hub, etc. They’ve even enabled it for the new Yahoo Pipes, so I can head over there and suggest that they change the name to Yahoo Tubes, in honour of Senator Whatshisname and his metaphor for the Internet.

As Loren Baker at Search Engine Journal and Frantic Industries and L.M. Orchard at DecafBad point out, the frenzy of Yahoo-bashing that this caused over at Digg is ridiculous — while at the same time not totally surprising, given the nature of the site and the mob mentality it often produces. Digg no more invented the idea of voting things up or down than I invented faster-than-light travel (oops, that was supposed to be a secret too). The inimitable Jason Calacanis has more on that here.

I’m with Mike Arrington: Digg fans need to chillax. (screenshot comes from Cory at Lost Remote).

Update:

Frantic Industries notes that Microsoft seems to be getting into this game too, but so far only on foreign MSN sites. It doesn’t look much like Digg, either, so maybe the fan boys will leave it alone.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • All digg did was add some nice pastel colours to an already exisitng ide of rating stuffand popularized it among the slashdot wannabe's

    I am still not convinced that digg brings anything of real value to the table other than server spikes.
  • Mathew
    I agree that the "look and feel" is hardly unique, Steven, nor is the idea of rating things (see Slashdot, etc.). As for the "flash crowds" that come from Digg, their long term value is definitely questionable -- although I am a fan of the site.
  • Did you JUST say Chillax?

    ;)
  • Mathew
    Totally, dude.

    I was going to say "Chillin' like a villain" but I decided against it :-)
  • actually, Digg opened it's source and it is now being used by a number of websites for a number of purposes
  • oh, JEEBUS you did NOT say that!



    :)

    t
  • Mathew
    Word :-)
  • mike
    Where on earth did you learn how to spell? Slack-grammar seems to be the rule of the day. Why didnt you begin your sentence with "So", many of the other idiots do that.
  • Mathew
    Thanks for the comment, Mike. I think you missed a joke somewhere along the line there. Oh, and "slack grammar" doesn't take a hyphen, you left out the apostrophe in "didn't," and your last sentence should have ended in a question mark. But thanks for stopping by.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post: Are Canadians copyright pirates?

Newer post: Senator Ted wants to block the tubes