Wikinomics pushes Web 2.0 mainstream

by Mathew on January 13, 2007 · Comments

Along with Toronto blogosphere luminaries such as David Crow of Ambient Vector and DemoCamp fame, Mark Kuznicki of Remarkk, ex-Flockster Will Pate (soon to be a Torontonian, I hear), Eli Singer of CaseCamp and Tom Purves of firestoker, I attended the launch of Don Tapscott’s new book Wikinomics — subtitled “How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything” — on Thursday at U of T. My first thought? Bob Rae looks a bit like a Muppet character.

My second thought was that Web 2.0 must be crossing some kind of Rubicon, when a guy like Don can get that many corporate types into a room for the launch of a book about wikis and blogs and peer-to-peer collaboration. And he does it by making it clear that Web 2.0 principles can help traditional companies like gold miners and manufacturers, and that it’s not just feel-good claptrap tossed around by twenty-somethings with fake dreadlocks and Hello Kitty T-shirts.

wikinomics.jpg

Will is right that Don, while not actually part of the Web 2.0 movement, makes a good “translator and diplomat” when it comes to explaining the benefits of Web interactivity to a skeptical, non-Webby crowd. If there’s one thing Don is good at, it is taking an emerging field or trend and giving an overview of why it’s important — pulling strands together, explaining them and packaging them in a way that is easily understandable for a novice. That is a valuable skill.

And Don is trying to walk the walk as well, with a wiki aimed at writing the last chapter of the book interactively, and a fledgling Wikinomics community powered by local social-networking platform PikSpot, which I am quietly (or not so quietly) proud to have known about before David.

Just one thing, Don: I couldn’t help but notice in your speech that you credited your daughter with introducing you to the wonderful social network known as “the Facebook” — better be careful, or you will be lumped in with George Bush, who recently referred to how much he liked using “the Google” :-)

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • This post has really piqued my interest in the book. But I still like my characterization of the Tapscott skill set better. :)
  • Thanks for the kind words Mathew. I've very gratified by how well this book is doing and very thankful for your interest and support. Not that anyone is interested but I don't view myself only as a translator of the Web to mainstream types. I've been using the ARPANET since 1978 and have "deeply immersed" in all this since then. (Um, no I didn't Invent the Internet..) The largest study ever condicted on the Web 2.0 was done by our team in 2000-1. We called it the "Hypernet" -- pervasive, broadband, service oriented, networked computing arguing that the web was engtering a second era, explaining how this would transfor the enterprise. We've continued that work with millions of dollars of research examining the Enterprise 2.0 Still if some in the blogosphere think of me as a translator, instead of a researcher, practioner and inventor of original big ideas I'll happily take it, if our work helps move the ball forward.
  • Mathew Ingram
    Thanks for the comment, Don. And I think comparing you to a translator doesn't necessarily mean that you aren't part of what you're describing -- I think it just means that you are good at taking those things and explaining them to others who aren't quite as immersed in it. It's all good.
  • Mike Dover
    Hi Mathew:

    i think you may have misheard Don. I've never heard him say THE facebook, and we've been commenting about it for a long time.

    On that note: check your inbox, I've joined you in the 30+ contingent on Facebook.

    Mike
  • Mathew Ingram
    Thanks, Mike, I just added you -- and I will give Don the benefit of the doubt about the "the Facebook" thing :-)
  • Maybe I said Facebook is THE Bomb!
  • Mathew Ingram
    :-)
  • To be fair, Facebook was at thefacebook.com before they bought the facebook.com domain. It's probably one of the few cases in which calling it "The Thing" is acceptable.
  • I fully agree with the comment on the book. Here are my two cents about it:
    http://manuelhp42.blogspot.com/2007/01/wikinomics-more-than-open-source-mumbo.html
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: