Seven ways to help Digg get better

by Mathew on January 3, 2007 · Comments

Before too much time goes by, I wanted to take note of something that Muhammad Saleem wrote over on his blog The Mu Life about 7 ways to improve Digg. Muhammad, who is not only a top digger but also a top Netscape submitter and anchor, has clearly thought a lot about some of the flaws with the Digg model — including things such as the “Bury Brigade” and the problems with comments — and I think some of his suggestions make a lot of sense.

One of the most important recommendations, I think, is the first: Listen to the community. And I would add to that: “respond to the community.” If there’s one thing that Digg has not been terribly good at — during all the criticism about the changes to its algorithm to stop the “gaming” of the site, and the various other problems it has experienced — it’s responding to and interacting with the community.

At times, it seems like Kevin Rose and the gang want to have a community-run news site, but without having to actually deal with the community, or like they think that if they tinker with enough things behind the scenes it will become a smooth-running machine and no input from them will be required. I would argue they are wrong on both counts. A community isn’t a machine but a garden, and it takes work to cultivate and keep the weeds from taking over.

Muhammad has a bunch of other good suggestions, including retiring the Bury Brigade — which Steve O’Hear of ZDNet has been on the receiving end of — and being more explicit about the moderating and filtering of content that occurs behind the scenes at Digg. I encourage you to go and read the rest.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Mathew,
    the only big, big, big, problem with digg is its useless banning engine.
    I hope they'll solve this problem soon. It seems that sending emails to them is completely useless. Here's my last post on this:

    http://lucafiligheddu.blogspot.com/2007/01/digg...
  • I agree, Mathew. One of the things that has long bothered me about digg (though let's face it, it's still just about the best social news platform out there pound-for-pound) is the management's insistence about how "organic" the community is and what the community wants (via digging, burying, and so on) the community gets, and so on. From what I've seen this is simply not the case, what with the weighting of "diggs," weighting of digg users, etc. Some of this is necessary to run a successful social news community, but the attitude of the people who run the community -- how they interact with their community, the message and attitude they convey, etc. -- are very important.
  • But how is Digg going to make improvements unless it turns iitself into a business? Then again, it may pursue improvements to make itself more attractive as a takeover target..:)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post: Jobs’ reality-distortion field still intact

Newer post: Bubbleshare finally gets acquired