Okay, that was a little weird

by Mathew on December 13, 2006 · Comments

Let me just say that I have a lot of respect for Virginia Heffernan, the TV writer for the New York Times. I think she’s a good writer, and I like her blog Screens as well — but the piece she just wrote about Amanda Congdon’s debut on ABC News is, well… really out there. I watched Amanda’s first show, and I found it sort of grating in the same way Rocketboom was — she overdid the perkiness just a tad, and the hair-flipping and the wide-eyed innocence thing.

And the items she did were, well, underwhelming. For a debut, I would think she could have done a little better than a bit about Tori Spelling’s garage sale and a company that makes fake blood — although she did take a shot at ABC for having a pop-up video player instead of embedded video (you can’t fast forward or rewind either, which is dumb). But it was pretty gee whiz, and kind of, well… dumb.

amanda-congdon.jpg

But that’s not what Virginia saw. She says:

Like a teenager, she seems exaggeratedly puzzled by whatever’s at hand; she’s too cool for almost everything, and good for her. To achieve this effect, she often appeals to the camera — the audience? God? — to find out what’s going on.

Slim, swan-necked, with the upright bearing of a dancer or cadet, she doesn’t exactly lean in for intimacy with the viewer. She’s not relatable. She seems a touch abstemious.

In case you’re wondering, “abstemious” means to use temperance or moderation. In any case, Virginia then goes on to compare Amanda’s engagement — which she indicates by saying things like “That was weird” — with Walter Cronkite of all people. She even says that a shrug by Amanda during a report on New Orleans was “an editorial in itself.” I’m not making this up.

To tell you the honest truth, I thought for a second that maybe Virginia’s piece was an elaborate Onion-style parody. But I don’t think it was. My friend Joey deVilla from Global Nerdy appears to be similarly nonplussed. And TDavid doesn’t think much of it either (great line about Amanda’s departure being “like Suzanne Somers leaving Three’s Company in season three).

Update:

Andrew Baron says on his blog that Amanda Across America and the ABC and HBO deals were either completely or in large part a result of work he did at Rocketboom before Amanda left (hat tip to Cory Bergman at Lost Remote for the link). Oh yes, and the inimitable Loren Feldman weighs in on Amanda’s debut — he was so underwhelmed he couldn’t even be bothered to get out of bed to tape his video review.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Jeff Jarvis notes Heffernan's "rave" review and says he liked the show. No idea whether that's true or not - from what he wrote about the Rocketboom thing it's obvious that she's an acquaintance or a friend. Personally, I think it's vacuous, and that she's getting a huge pass because of the way she looks. And that that says more about media criticism and media critics than anything else.
  • Mathew Ingram
    I totally agree, Rob. And Virginia even says that it shows women can be smart and sexy, which I think it does anything but -- if anything, Amanda seems ditzier and more of an airhead on ABC than she did on Rocketboom. I'm all for irreverent and whatnot, but it just seems like lightweight fluff to me.
  • I have written my thoughts and comments including why I think this was a disgrace to women online here:
    http://www.centernetworks.com/amanda-congdon-video-disappointing-disgrace-to-women
  • jm
    Hey, Rob, look at your logic here. How many pretty girls are there in NY/LA NOT the recipients of your "huge pass"? Face it, Amanda has something special you and some others (Ingrem et al) don't get. That's OK. Obviously plenty of smart people do get it (Heffernan,Jarvis). But please spare us your lame "explanations".
  • Mathew Ingram
    I get it, JM -- I just don't want it.
  • As Jeff is also the blogger-fan-in-chief of Howard Stern, it's not the first time I've not exactly understood where he's coming from. However, the over-played way in which Amanda revolves her chair for those pausing profile shots is clearly a "wink-wink" shout-out to fans who aren't necessarily tuning in to catch up on her news and views. My biggest disagreement with Hefferman's review is when she writes this, "What stands out is Ms. Congdon’s reflexive bafflement." I guess that's because I've never heard the term "reflective bafflement" used as a euphemism for tight T-shirt.
  • Mathew Ingram
    I agree, Rex. And it struck me as odd that Virginia kept referring to her reflexive bafflement and her "abstemious" attitude, and then at the same time congratulated her on being a welcome return to the engagement of Walter Cronkite. Bizarre.
  • I lasted less than one minute watching Amanda's wide eyed hair flipping cutsy patoosie chair spinning performance. Amanda has something special alright, but I think you can buys those for a couple thousand dollars (not including the 5 bucks on the tight tee) and weeks recovery at a Spa. Lord, can we not do better than that in 2006?
  • FYI, Walter Cronkite is alive and well, and not spinning in any grave.
    He recently offered his review of Katie Couric's performance at CBS; maybe he will weigh in on Amanda's debut as well.
  • Mathew Ingram
    Oops. Thanks, Sandy. Obviously, rumours of Walter's demise have been greatly exaggerated, etc. :-) I would love to get his thoughts on the comparison between him and Amanda.
  • Yah, thanks for the advice JM. (Time to go back to reading your Tiger Beat).
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: