Two announcements that indicate the process of evolution in the TV 2.0 business is really picking up a head of steam: Brightcove — which until recently was like the wizard behind the curtains, powering online TV ventures such as the recently announced music video deal with Warner Music — remakes itself with a consumer-facing site and service that plans to compensate users for video content, and Metacafe announces its “producer awards” feature, which pays video uploaders $5 for every 1,000 views their video gets above the 20,000 mark.

Plenty of people wondering what this means for GooTube, of course, now that Google has paid $1.6-billion out of petty cash for the thing — but it’s also worth wondering how the folks over at Revver are feeling, since they more or less pioneered the whole “pay the users” video thing. Thanks to Revver, the guys at Eepybird.com who made the Diet Coke-Mentos video got $30,000 or so for all the views that their clip got (Revver pays creators 50 per cent of the ad revenue they get, and you can also get paid based on how many places the video is embedded).


As Matt Marshall explains over at VentureBeat, Metacafe not only pays producers of video, it also tries to filter out the chaff by submitting videos to a group of reviewers who give it the thumbs up or down before it hits the site, adding a kind of Digg-style (or American Idol-style) voting aspect to it. And then there’s Brightcove, which will give content owners 50 per cent of the revenue from ads, or the ability to offer paid downloads of their content, for which they get 70 per cent.

In a sense, YouTube and its ilk are coming at the market from the opposite end of things as Brightcove: they started with videos of kittens and skateboarders hurting themselves and so on, and are now trying to become more mainstream and legitimate, while Brightcove started as the corporate stooge who works with the networks and now wants to layer some popular, viral video on top of all that. Who will win? The betting window is now open.


Marshall at TechCrunch notes that Google also tweaked its video service today, by adding a “sponsored” video category aimed at major TV production outfits (those with at least 1,000 hours of video). The new feature launched with a Coke video with none other than the Eepybird Mentos guys.

About the author

Mathew 2429 posts

I'm a Toronto-based senior writer with Fortune magazine, and my favorite things to write about are social technology, media and the evolution of online behavior

7 Responses to “TV 2.0 — slouching towards Bethlehem”
  1. s not forget another cause of bottom of the dial radio weirdness: Christian right stations poaching bandwidth. paidcontent.org: Justin Daly & Yahoo’s future. DIY boarding pass site boarded up. Coming to get you, Al Zawahiri. Ingram: T.V 2.0. Google domino effect. The customer is always right–among other things. Blog business summit wrap up. Another.com: Skype-based RSS reader. Dammit–can’t compile Linux 2.6.10 on FC 5. Rude Pundit on Wolf Blitzer

  2. TV 2.0 — slouching towards Bethlehem via Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work October 30th, 2006 at 22:57

  3. […] TV is racing to become … whatever it will become. […]

  4. […] From the blogosphere: Mashable!, The Next Net, Lost Remote, Nyquist Capital, Mathew Ingram, CNNMoney.com, Paul Kapustka’s Blog, Bourland.com, Business Filter, Silicon Valley Watcher, What Will You See Next?, CyberJournalist.net Atantic, BrightCove, Elektra, Jeremy Allaire, Sire, Warner Music Group, YouTube […]

  5. […] Mathew Ingram function tgb_closewindow () { window.location.href = “http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/30/tv-20-slouching-towards-bethlehem/”; } […]

  6. Hello, for a long time I read your blog, thanks for that that write interesting and
    useful posts.I consider that blogers it is possible to name many journalists.

    Good luck

  7. nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-)
    keep it up

Comments are closed.