Blogs that have comments are better

by Mathew on February 18, 2006 · View Comments

After the rhetorical beating I got the last time I broached this subject, I should probably keep my mouth shut, but I can’t help myself. The subject, of course, is blogs and comments, and whether one can (or should) exist without the other. I suppose I should know better than to argue about the nature of blogs with a blog that calls itself Bloggers Blog – and (just so you don’t miss the point) gives its motto as “blogging the blogosphere” – but what the heck. The site, which is written by an author or authors unknown, says this:

“The argument that blogs are not a blog without comments is silly. Boing Boing, the most popular blog on the Internet, has no comments. Michelle Malkin’s blog has no comments. Post Secret has no comments. Seth Godin’s blog has trackbacks but no comments. There aren’t many that would argue these commentless blogs are not blogs.”

There may not be many who would argue this, but I feel compelled to wade in there anyway (I hate crowds.) Am I really going to argue that Boing Boing, the most popular blog on the Interweb, isn’t a blog? Yes. Or at least, not a very good one. Because I think that’s what we’re talking about here – not what a blog is (because there is no definition, or at least nothing that isn’t so vague that you could just as easily replace it with the term “web page”), but what makes a blog good or not. And I think one of the biggest factors, apart from actually having something worthwhile to say, is to have comments, whether you’re Russell Beattie or Dave Winer.

Why? Because blogs are about conversation, dialogue, back-and-forth, the fray (as Derek Powazek’s early venture was called) or whatever you want to call it. Yes, as Bloggers Blog and Dave and others have mentioned, you can write a response to something on your own blog and then link to the original post and comment that way, but not everyone is going to want (or have the time) to do that. Why leave them out? Maybe they have something to contribute. I would argue that Boing Boing and Post Secret and other sites like that (such as Valleywag, which has limited comments by registered users) are actually more like magazines than they are blogs. That doesn’t make them bad. It just makes them less good.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • http://www.bloggersblog.com/awards Bloggers Blog — Blog Awards

    all the spam. You can see an earlier post we had about blogs and comments called, “A Blog Without Comments is Still a Blog.” A few bloggers disagreed with what we posted and told us that blogs with comments are better — see posts at AMCP Tech Blog,Matthew Ingram and Green Valley Moments.

  • http://magazineenterprise360.com/blog/2006/02/27/clear-thoughts-on-blogs/ MagazineEnterprise360.com

    who loathe blogs, I meet two who think that blogs are “easy.” So I’m also grateful when I find a writer with a clear-headed view of what makes a blog good. If you’re thinking of launching a blog, please take a look at Mathew Ingram’s piecehere. He argues — correctly — that blogs with comment functions are better than blogs without them. And, as readers of this blog or my blog on B2B journalism know, I go so far as to argue — correctly, if I do say so myself

  • http://www.rightconversation.com/2006/02/links_for_20060_15.html AMY GAHRAN: The Right Conversation

    Blogs that have comments are better (Mathew ingram)

  • http://www.webpronews.com WebProNews – Breaking eBusiness News

    a blog’s content “dramatically,” and about 34 per cent say that commenting isn’t a requirement. The remainder think that a blog without comments isn’t a real blog – a case that I tried to make with this post back in February. After much debate, I modified that position to effectively agree with the largest group in Mike’s poll. I know everyone likes to say that it’s about “the conversation” and so on, which is getting a touch overused as a metaphor (but is still essentially true, I think). The bottom line for me

  • http://anoccasionalinterruption.wordpress.com/ Chuck

    I agree with what you are saying. It seems you are defining what a blog is, intentionally or not. I took a quick peek at wikipedia and a blog is somewhat defined as being conversational which supports what you are digging into. If a proclaimed blog does not allow comments then to me it is simply a web page and is no different than any other site that has a current “news” section in chronological order.

  • http://www.stuartmacdonald.ca Stuart MacDonald

    Nice, ‘thewie.

    – Stuart

  • Mathew

    Thanks for the comment, Chuck. I would agree.

    And thanks, Stu.

  • http://rightconversation.com Amy Gahran

    Hi, Mathew

    I think there’s a deeper point here — that is, the difference between publishing and conversational media. Blogging tools can be used for publishing (which is what Boing Boing generally does), or to support active conversation. And there’s a pretty big gray area in between, too.

    When making the distinction you’re trying to make, I personally don’t think it’s useful to focus on “blogs” per se.

    Blogs are not the point.

    What’s so exciting about blogs is that they can be used (especially when they allow comments) as a fairly accessible form of conversational media. Yes, they also can be used for publishing, which (I agree with you) is less exciting. So talking about “blogs” and “blogging” in this sense doesn’t get to the heart of the matter. Let’s not lose the forest for the trees — or the purpose for the tools, for that matter.

    IMHO, of course ;-)

    - Amy Gahran
    RightConversation.com
    Contentious.com

  • Mathew

    Thanks for the comment, Amy. I agree that the conversation is the important thing, and that focusing on what is or isn’t a “blog” sort of misses the point.

    Mathew

blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: