<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; wtf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/wtf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Techmeme and Google Shared Stuff: WTF&#063;</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/22/techmeme-and-google-shared-stuff-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/22/techmeme-and-google-shared-stuff-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techmeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/22/techmeme-and-google-shared-stuff-wtf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: It seems to be gone from Techmeme now &#8212; but still. Very weird. Original post: Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests has mentioned this too, but I&#8217;m not sure whether the problem is Techmeme&#8217;s or something that has gone squirrely with Google&#8217;s Shared Reader. A post entitled &#8220;Full Video of Ukraine Air Show Disaster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F09%2F22%2Ftechmeme-and-google-shared-stuff-wtf%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F09%2F22%2Ftechmeme-and-google-shared-stuff-wtf%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>It seems to be gone from Techmeme now &#8212; but still. Very weird.</p>
<p><b>Original post:</b></p>
<p>Tony Hung at Deep Jive Interests has <a href="http://www.deepjiveinterests.com/2007/09/22/techmeme-confuses-me-sometimes/">mentioned this too</a>, but I&#8217;m not sure whether the problem is Techmeme&#8217;s or something that has gone squirrely with Google&#8217;s Shared Reader. A <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/070922/p5#a070922p5">post</a> entitled &#8220;Full Video of Ukraine Air Show Disaster 2002&#8243; has been climbing up Techmeme for the past day or so, and as you can see from the screenshot it has reached the top.</p>
<p><img class="center" src='http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/techmeme2.jpg' alt='techmeme2.jpg' /></p>
<p>That, as Tony points out, is pretty weird. But it&#8217;s not the weirdest thing. The weirdest thing is that the link goes to a <a href="http://www.google.com/s2/sharing/stuff">Google&#8217;s Shared Stuff page</a> &#8212; not the page of stuff that I&#8217;ve shared, as it turns out, but the page of stuff that my friends and contacts have shared. So when I go there, I don&#8217;t see anything about video of the Ukraine Air Disaster. I see links from Pete Cashmore of Mashable and K. Paul Mallasch and Mark Evans and people like that.</p>
<p>Whose page of shared stuff has the video? Why the heck is it at the top of Techmeme? These and other questions are crying out to be answered (okay, not crying out &#8212; begging maybe). The only sub-link to the Ukraine video post the last time I looked at Techmeme was <a href="http://blog.k1v1n.com/2007/09/google-shared-stuff-confuses-me.html">a post by Kevin Gamble</a> entitled &#8220;Google Shared Stuff confuses me.&#8221; You and me both, Kevin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/22/techmeme-and-google-shared-stuff-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technorati foot-shooting again: WTF?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/31/technorati-foot-shooting-again-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/31/technorati-foot-shooting-again-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technorati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/31/technorati-foot-shooting-again-wtf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I saw Steve Rubel&#8217;s post about Technorati launching a new buzz-tracking, Digg-like thing and the first thing I thought was &#8220;WTF?&#8221; I know that&#8217;s the name of it &#8212; or was, since it&#8217;s apparently been yanked now &#8212; but I meant it in the original blogosphere/instant messaging sense of &#8220;what the f**?&#8221; Among other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F01%2F31%2Ftechnorati-foot-shooting-again-wtf%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F01%2F31%2Ftechnorati-foot-shooting-again-wtf%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>So I saw <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2007/01/new_technorati_.html">Steve Rubel&#8217;s post</a> about Technorati launching a new buzz-tracking, Digg-like thing and the first thing I thought was &#8220;WTF?&#8221; I know that&#8217;s the name of it &#8212; or was, since it&#8217;s apparently <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/31/technoratis-mysterious-disappearing-wtf-product/">been yanked now</a> &#8212; but I meant it in the original blogosphere/instant messaging sense of &#8220;what the f**?&#8221; Among other things, why would Technorati bother trying to reproduce something like Digg this late in the game?</p>
<p>Unlike <a href="http://www.901am.com/2007/technorati-prepares-digg-clone-wtf.html">some people</a>, I&#8217;m totally okay with the name (which apparently stands for &#8220;Where&#8217;s The Fire?&#8221;). It plays off the other meaning of WTF, which could add to the buzz, and I think it&#8217;s kind of funny. But why? And not just why launch something that appears to duplicate Digg &#8212; like dozens of other copycat sites, many of which use the Pligg open-source Digg platform &#8212; but why launch something that seems to have taken its servers down with it?</p>
<p>After all, it&#8217;s not as though Technorati has been sailing along as smooth as glass. There continue to be regular system issues, unexplained and sudden down-time, complaints about technorati&#8217;s blog-ranking numbers and so on. As <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/01/31/technorati-launches-wtf-digg-clone/#comment-834251">someone commented</a> at Darren Rowse&#8217;s Problogger: &#8220;How about they fix everything else thatâ€™s broken on their site before launching a new service?&#8221; A fair point.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>The site seems to have re-launched, with an explanation from Dave Sifry about <a href="http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000458.html">how it works</a>. If I understand it correctly, it seems that Technorati is asking users to write an explanation of why a particular search topic or subject is important, and then other users can vote that explanation <a href="http://technorati.com/wtf">up or down.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/01/31/technorati-foot-shooting-again-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

