<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; virgin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/virgin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Virgin volunteers to be Big Brother</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/virgin-volunteers-to-be-big-brother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/virgin-volunteers-to-be-big-brother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a piece in The Telegraph this morning, Virgin Media &#8212; the Internet service provider run by Richard Branson&#8217;s Virgin conglomerate &#8212; has volunteered to play copyright cop and yank the Internet account of users who share infringing material. Virgin and the British Phonographic Industry are apparently working out the details, which will likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F03%2F31%2Fvirgin-volunteers-to-be-big-brother%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F03%2F31%2Fvirgin-volunteers-to-be-big-brother%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>According to a piece in The Telegraph this morning, Virgin Media &#8212; the Internet service provider run by Richard Branson&#8217;s Virgin conglomerate &#8212; has volunteered <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/03/30/cnvirgin130.xml">to play copyright cop</a> and yank the Internet account of users who share infringing material. Virgin and the British Phonographic Industry are apparently working out the details, which will likely involve the &#8220;three strikes and you&#8217;re out&#8221; approach.</p>
<p>Under this system &#8212; which <a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15446">has been proposed</a> by several copyright enforcement bodies as either a voluntary process or one that could be legislated &#8212; Internet users would get a letter from their ISP after the first &#8220;offence,&#8221; then their account would be suspended (no word on for how long), and after a third infraction they would be disconnected completely. It&#8217;s not clear whether Virgin is going to play ball with cutting people off, but the  story says that &#8220;remains an option&#8221; (although Torrentfreak says there <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/isp-to-voluntarily-disconnect-file-sharers-from-the-internet-080331/">could be a silver lining</a> to the Virgin move).</p>
<p>As more than one person (<a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/12/drop-that-mouse-and-put-your-hands-up/">including me</a>) has pointed out, this approach sounds like a great idea right up until you try to imagine how it&#8217;s going to work. Would users be cut off for a single shared file &#8212; and if not, then how many? Would they be cut off for days, or weeks? What if the account holder isn&#8217;t the one sharing the files? How is the BPI going to track activity? How <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/31/virgin_media_bpi_three_strikes/">will the money be shared</a>? Determined pirates won&#8217;t be the ones caught by this plan &#8212; only the unwitting or stupid.</p>
<p>As I mentioned in <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/12/drop-that-mouse-and-put-your-hands-up/">my previous post</a> on this topic, not only would turning ISPs into Internet police open up a giant can of worms &#8212; especially since Virgin would be voluntarily turning over the names and addresses of users suspected of engaging in illicit behaviour &#8212; but criminalizing copyright infringement on such a massive scale is all out of proportion with the damage that is allegedly being inflicted on the music industry. And yet, we seem to be facing either an ISP cop <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/27/is-a-music-tax-paid-to-isps-the-answer/">or ISP extortion</a>.</p>
<p>The more I think about it, the more it looks like this could be the beginning of Act Two of the music industry&#8217;s ongoing self-immolation, with the lawsuits by the RIAA as Act One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/virgin-volunteers-to-be-big-brother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

