Posts tagged as:

viacom

Is the DMCA harbour safe for YouTube?

by Mathew on March 24, 2007 · 0 comments

In an op-ed piece in the Washington Post, a lawyer for entertainment giant Viacom writes what amounts to a thumbnail summary of the company’s $1-billion lawsuit against YouTube for copyright infringement. In a nutshell, Michael Fricklas says that the case boils down to whether the video site — now part of the Google empire — [...]

{ 0 comments }

So Viacom has slapped Google (or YouTube) with a $1-billion lawsuit for blatant copyright infringement on a massive scale, according to the entertainment conglomerate’s claim. On a side note, have you ever noticed how people invariably get slapped with lawsuits? Not just hit — slapped. And a big thick lawsuit would hurt, I bet. Especially [...]

{ 8 comments }

Viacom goes one way, BBC the other

by Mathew on March 2, 2007 · 4 comments

So Viacom is apparently bragging about how traffic to its properties, including Comedy Central, has climbed by as much as 90 per cent since it told YouTube to take down 100,000 or so of its video clips. And much of that traffic boost is people coming to watch videos, the company says. To me, this [...]

{ 4 comments }

Google’s early video deals crumble

by Mathew on February 21, 2007 · 2 comments

(cross-posted from my Globe and Mail blog) Not that long ago, Google seemed to be carving out a brave new world in online video. Just before it bought YouTube for the eye-popping sum of $1.6-billion, the company announced that it had signed deals with several content providers, including CBS, and there was talk of a [...]

{ 2 comments }

The Skype boys take on GooTube

by Mathew on February 20, 2007 · 1 comment

Update: The Wall Street Journal’s story has been confirmed by CNet and by Reuters. No financial terms disclosed (Viacom’s typical deal is apparently to get two-thirds of the ad revenue), and CNet says that the arrangement — at least in the beginning — won’t include some of Viacom’s premier content, including Comedy Central shows such [...]

{ 1 comment }