<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Search engines aren&#8217;t leeches</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/09/search-engines-arent-leeches-theyre-labradors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/09/search-engines-arent-leeches-theyre-labradors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/01/09/search-engines-arent-leeches-theyre-labradors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jakob Nielsen is highly regarded as a web designer and usability expert &#8212; although I think his website at useit.com could use a few more splashes of colour (that&#8217;s a joke, Jakob) &#8212; but I think his recent post about search engines being &#8220;leeches&#8221; of the Internet is way off base. His own summary of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F01%2F09%2Fsearch-engines-arent-leeches-theyre-labradors%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F01%2F09%2Fsearch-engines-arent-leeches-theyre-labradors%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Jakob Nielsen is highly regarded as a web designer and usability expert &#8212; although I think his website at <a href="http://useit.com" title="http://useit.com" target="_blank">useit.com</a> could use a few more splashes of colour (that&#8217;s a joke, Jakob) &#8212; but I think his <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/search_engines.html">recent post</a> about search engines being &#8220;leeches&#8221; of the Internet is way off base. His own summary of the post is as follows: &#8220;Search engines extract too much of the Web&#8217;s value, leaving too little for the websites that actually create the content. Liberation from search dependency is a strategic imperative for both websites and software vendors.&#8221;</p>
<p>No disrespect to Jakob, but this &#8212; as the philosopher Jeremy Bentham once said &#8212; is &#8220;nonsense on stilts.&#8221; It&#8217;s an issue that has <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/14/content-creator-or-slave/">come up before</a>, and no doubt will again: Do search engines and aggregators &#8220;steal&#8221; content from the websites they index, and by selling ads based on that content, &#8220;steal&#8221; money from those sites? You might as well argue that the Yellow Pages steals from the companies that are listed in its pages, or that newspapers &#8220;steal&#8221; money from companies that advertise in their classified listings.</p>
<p>In his <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/search_engines.html">discussion of this &#8220;theft,&#8221;</a> Jakob describes a website that becomes more profitable by increasing its usability, but then watches as all its competitors do likewise; because they are also more profitable, these competitors can then bid more for search-based ads, which drives up the price for the original website, thus robbing it of all those benefits. In reality, all Jakob has described is the normal functioning of a market &#8212; in this case, for search-based ads. Search engines drive traffic to a site, which helps increase its profitability. How is that wrong?</p>
<p>Jason Calacanis calls Jakob&#8217;s post <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2006/01/09/the-stupidest-thing-ive-read-in-a-long-time/">&#8220;the stupidest thing I&#8217;ve read in a long time,&#8221;</a> and he&#8217;s not far wrong. Danny Sullivan of SearchEngineWatch has a more balanced view, but even after <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060109-132719">giving Jakob points</a> for a couple of aspects of his post, he still can&#8217;t agree with central argument. And that&#8217;s because it&#8217;s nonsensical. Jakob may know a lot about usability, but he doesn&#8217;t know a darn thing about economics &#8212; Internet or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/09/search-engines-arent-leeches-theyre-labradors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

