<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; Tweetdeck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/tweetdeck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tweetdeck rules &#8212; that is all</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/10/tweetdeck-rules-that-is-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/10/tweetdeck-rules-that-is-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweetdeck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Arrington has a post up at TechCrunch about a Twitter client called Tweetvisor, which he says is &#8220;a contender for best alternate Twitter interface&#8221; (next the to the Web interface, presumably). I had a look, but like my friend Mark Evans &#8212; who wrote a post on his Twitterrati blog &#8212; I was underwhelmed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2009%2F01%2F10%2Ftweetdeck-rules-that-is-all%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2009%2F01%2F10%2Ftweetdeck-rules-that-is-all%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Mike Arrington has a post up at TechCrunch about a Twitter client called Tweetvisor, which <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/08/tweetvisor-a-contender-for-best-alternate-twitter-interface/">he says is</a> &#8220;a contender for best alternate Twitter interface&#8221; (next the to the Web interface, presumably). I had a look, but like my friend Mark Evans &#8212; who wrote <a href="http://www.twitterrati.com/2009/01/10/tweetvisor-good-but-splitweets-better/">a post</a> on his Twitterrati blog &#8212; I was underwhelmed by Tweetvisor&#8217;s interface. It might be handy to be able to manage multiple Twitter accounts, I suppose (although who needs to do that? people with multiple personalities? marketing people, I assume), but I couldn&#8217;t see much else that was all that compelling.</p>
<p><span id="more-3997"></span></p>
<p>Like a lot of people, I try almost every Twitter client and interface that comes down the pike &#8212; I try out beta versions of things the way some women I know like to shop for shoes. I started with <a href="http://twhirl.org">Twhirl</a>, which I quite liked, and I&#8217;ve tried <a href="http://code.google.com/p/gtwitter/">gTwitter</a> on Ubuntu and accessing my Twitter account through Digsby and other chat clients, and I&#8217;ve used <a href="http://www.ejecutive.co.uk/projects/twitterlicious">Twitterlicious</a> and <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5081">Twitterfox</a> and Twitterific on the iPhone (a great mobile client). But in my opinion there is nothing &#8212; so far &#8212; that even comes close to <a href="http://tweetdeck.com">Tweetdeck</a>.</p>
<p>When I first tried it, the Tweetdeck interface looked too cluttered to me, with multiple panes and buttons and so on, but it&#8217;s a lot simpler than I thought, and it&#8217;s extremely customizable. I have five panes open at a time (but they scroll from left to right, so you don&#8217;t have to see them all at once): I have the people I follow, then I have all the @ replies to me, then direct messages in another pane. And then I have a group that I&#8217;ve created to track specific people &#8212; one of the key features that I like about Tweetdeck &#8212; and finally a pane with a <a href="http://Twitscoop.com" title="http://Twitscoop.com" target="_blank">Twitscoop.com</a> search-keyword cloud.</p>
<p>As a journalist, I&#8217;m not just trying to keep up with what my friends are doing (although that&#8217;s a big part of the appeal of Twitter). I&#8217;m also looking for links to newsworthy things, and following what people are talking about to see if it merits a story or a link somewhere, and the Twitscoop pane in particular is invaluable for that. When the bombings occurred in Mumbai, I saw tweets about it, but I also saw the keyword getting bigger and bigger in the Twitscoop cloud, which meant lots of people were mentioning it.</p>
<p>When you add the ability to customize groups &#8212; and add people to groups with a single click &#8212; as well as do searches, shorten URLs with multiple shortening services, and all the usual features like the ability to re-tweet, favourite and direct message and so on, you have a pretty feature-packed app. I suppose someone might come along with something better, but until then Tweetdeck is the king of the hill as far as I&#8217;m concerned, and that&#8217;s why I&#8217;ve been telling every journalist I work that if they&#8217;re serious about Twitter as a social-media tool they need to download and install it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/10/tweetdeck-rules-that-is-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

