<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube: The hits just keep on coming</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/10/youtube-the-hits-just-keep-on-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/10/youtube-the-hits-just-keep-on-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just yesterday, it was Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer that signed a deal with YouTube, allowing the video site to run full-length versions of movies (although the initial selection was somewhat less than stellar). Today, the site announced a deal with Freemantle Productions, the creators of the American Idol reality-show franchise, that will see the production company create a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F11%2F10%2Fyoutube-the-hits-just-keep-on-coming%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F11%2F10%2Fyoutube-the-hits-just-keep-on-coming%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Just yesterday, it was Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4A90KO20081110">signed a deal</a> with YouTube, allowing the video site to run full-length versions of movies (although the initial selection was <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/09/mgm-to-launch-movies-on-youtube/">somewhat less than stellar</a>). Today, the site announced a deal with Freemantle Productions, the creators of the American Idol reality-show franchise, that will see the production company create a channel for <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE4A957620081110">all of its existing shows</a>, but also a new channel for exclusive content that it will create specifically for YouTube.</p>
<p>Soon, YouTube will be carrying ad-supported TV shows from CBS, clips from LionsGate movies with pre-rolls and post-rolls, full-length movies from MGM and exclusive content from one of the world&#8217;s leading reality-show producers. Not bad for a site that started with video clips of funny cats and skateboard pratfalls, and is still considered by some to be a kind of trailer-park ghetto of video (yes, Mark Cuban, we&#8217;re looking at you). With <a href="http://Hulu.com" title="http://Hulu.com" target="_blank">Hulu.com</a> adding plenty of mainstream content too, the competition in online video definitely seems to be heating up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/11/10/youtube-the-hits-just-keep-on-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV 2.0: Revision3 cancels some shows</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/27/tv-20-revision3-cancels-some-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/27/tv-20-revision3-cancels-some-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just found out via Adam Ostrow at Mashable that Revision3 &#8212; the Web TV venture from the Digg boys, Kevin Rose and Jay Adelson &#8212; has laid off several people and shut down the filming of a few shows, including Internet Superstar with Martin Sargent and PopSiren with Sarah Lane. Interestingly enough, the hosts of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F10%2F27%2Ftv-20-revision3-cancels-some-shows%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F10%2F27%2Ftv-20-revision3-cancels-some-shows%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Just found out via Adam Ostrow at Mashable that Revision3 &#8212; the Web TV venture from the Digg boys, Kevin Rose and Jay Adelson &#8212; has <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/10/27/revision3-layoffs/">laid off several people</a> and shut down the filming of a few shows, including Internet Superstar with Martin Sargent and PopSiren with Sarah Lane. Interestingly enough, the hosts of both shows used to work on G4 and TechTV, the shows that Kevin Rose got his start on as a fresh-faced young geek (okay, he&#8217;s still a fresh-faced young geek, but you get my point). Sarah Lane is also the director of production for Revision3, according to <a href="http://revision3.com/popsiren/about/#host_9">her bio</a>. There have been other executive layoffs <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10076157-36.html?part=rss&#038;subj=TheSocial">as well</a> apparently.</p>
<p>In what has to be a bandwidth cost-related move, Revision3 is also stopping distribution of two shows, including social-media guru Gary Vaynerchuk&#8217;s popular Wine Library. In a blog post about the moves, CEO Jim Louderback <a href="http://revision3.com/blog/2008/10/27/changes-to-revision3/">says that</a> PopSiren and Internet Superstar &#8220;had great promise, but never really found their audience.&#8221; The company is also stopping production of a long-running show called Pixel Perfect, which was apparently an instructional program about using Photoshop. Some of the shutdowns have predictably had spinoff effects, as Liz Gannes <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/10/27/revision3-makes-layoffs/">describes</a> at NewTeeVee.</p>
<p><span id="more-3244"></span></p>
<p>Despite the layoffs, Louderback says the company still has high hopes for the shows it has launched through its startup effort, <a href="http://www.revision3beta.com/">Revision3 Beta</a> &#8212; a kind of farm-team approach to developing new talent and new shows &#8212; which got underway with seven shows <a href="http://revision3.com/blog/2008/09/24/revision3-beta-the-future-of-internet-television/">last month</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/27/tv-20-revision3-cancels-some-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SNL to get website &#8212; what took so long?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/14/snl-to-get-website-what-took-so-long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/14/snl-to-get-website-what-took-so-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a report at Broadcasting &#038; Cable, the tall foreheads at Saturday Night Live &#8212; including Canadian-born creator Lorne &#8220;Dr. Evil&#8221; Michaels &#8212; are in talks with NBC about setting up a standalone site for the show, one that would feature clips as well as out-takes, video of rehearsals and so on. This seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F10%2F14%2Fsnl-to-get-website-what-took-so-long%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F10%2F14%2Fsnl-to-get-website-what-took-so-long%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>According to a report at Broadcasting &#038; Cable, the tall foreheads at Saturday Night Live &#8212; including Canadian-born creator Lorne &#8220;Dr. Evil&#8221; Michaels &#8212; are in talks with NBC about <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6604458.html">setting up a standalone site</a> for the show, one that would feature clips as well as out-takes, video of rehearsals and so on. This seems like such a no-brainer that it&#8217;s hard to understand why it hasn&#8217;t happened already. There are clips on Hulu (which I would embed here, if it weren&#8217;t for the fact that they aren&#8217;t available outside of the U.S.), but the show could be doing so much more with its content.</p>
<p>Apparently the audience that Tina Fey&#8217;s impersonation of vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin has been drawing has caused more than a few jaws to drop at NBC. <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.san&#038;s=92449&#038;Nid=48249&#038;p=918739">According to MediaPost</a>, clips of Fey doing her thing have pulled in twice as many viewers as watched the originals on NBC, which according to a comment from TVbythenumbers at Silicon Alley Insider is <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/10/saturday-night-live-more-popular-when-it-isn-t-tina-fey-a-bigger-hit-on-dvr-online-than-broadcast#comment-48f36ec214b9b907003f2fa3">almost unheard of</a>. Obviously, those numbers are getting a boost from the election and the heightened awareness of the topic, but there&#8217;s also a feedback loop effect that SNL is benefiting from.</p>
<p><span id="more-2937"></span></p>
<p>What if you could watch rehearsals for some of those SNL skits online &#8212; maybe through a special-access &#8220;backstage&#8221; pass for a small fee &#8212; and then see the finished product that same night? The show could even allow viewers to vote on the sketches they like (which could either lead to fewer stinkers or create more of them), or come up with other interactive features. Regardless, the ability to see more of the performers they like and the skits they want to watch would only <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/10/13/snl-planning-its-own-video-site/">deepen the relationship</a> that fans have with the show, and would do so much better than Hulu can.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>As it turns out, the guy in charge of the SNL standalone site is none other than man-about-town <a href="http://www.fimoculous.com/archive/post-5219.cfm">Rex &#8220;Fimoculous&#8221; Sorgatz</a>. Does that explain girlfriend (and Huffington Post blogger) Rachel Sklar&#8217;s SNL obsession, or are the two unrelated? Inquiring minds want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/14/snl-to-get-website-what-took-so-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joost to euthanize desktop client</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/05/joost-to-euthanize-desktop-client/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/05/joost-to-euthanize-desktop-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Joost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Om Malik says that he has it on good authority that Joost &#8212; the much-hyped P2P online video startup run by the founders of Skype and Kazaa &#8212; is planning to kill its desktop client. This news was likely met in many quarters by a resounding cry of &#8220;What took so long?&#8221; Although [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F09%2F05%2Fjoost-to-euthanize-desktop-client%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F09%2F05%2Fjoost-to-euthanize-desktop-client%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>My friend Om Malik says that he has it on good authority that Joost &#8212; the much-hyped P2P online video startup run by the founders of Skype and Kazaa &#8212; is <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/09/05/joost-to-kill-desktop-client/">planning to kill</a> its desktop client. This news was likely met in many quarters by a resounding cry of &#8220;What took so long?&#8221; Although the first few iterations of Joost&#8217;s client showed some promise, the app soon became (in my view at least) a bloated front-end to a lacklustre service. There were hints of some interesting features, such as the semi-transparent live chat window that you could bring up while watching a show, but too few of them were realized. </p>
<p><span id="more-2626"></span></p>
<p>And while Joost was trying to get its act together, online video was maturing, and competitors such as <a href="http://Hulu.com" title="http://Hulu.com" target="_blank">Hulu.com</a> have changed the game considerably. Joost has other problems apart from its download client, mind you &#8212; one of the major ones being a lack of compelling content, something that Hulu has in spades. And there&#8217;s a direct relationship between that and Joost&#8217;s biggest problem, which is that the service is too much like regular TV: you can&#8217;t watch whatever you want, when you want, or download it or do anything else with it, because the networks and other content companies won&#8217;t let you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to take a lot more than a switch from a desktop client to Web streaming to solve that problem. And as Webware reports, even though the new service will stream through your browser, you <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10033798-2.html?part=rss&#038;tag=feed&#038;subj=Webware">still have to install</a> a pretty whopping plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/09/05/joost-to-euthanize-desktop-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zucker is wrong to be so smug</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/15/zucker-is-wrong-to-be-so-smug/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/15/zucker-is-wrong-to-be-so-smug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Predictably enough, NBC head honcho Jeff Zucker &#8212; the guy who previously ranted about how he&#8217;d rather have TV dollars than a few measly &#8220;digital pennies&#8221; &#8212; is crowing about how the massive viewership numbers for the Phelps&#8230; er, Olympic Games illustrate the dominance of network television and the relative irrelevance of the Interweb when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F08%2F15%2Fzucker-is-wrong-to-be-so-smug%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F08%2F15%2Fzucker-is-wrong-to-be-so-smug%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Predictably enough, NBC head honcho Jeff Zucker &#8212; the guy who previously ranted about how he&#8217;d rather have TV dollars than a few measly &#8220;digital pennies&#8221; &#8212; is <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/08/nbc-cries-itsel.html">crowing about</a> how the massive viewership numbers for the Phelps&#8230; er, Olympic Games illustrate the dominance of network television and the relative irrelevance of the Interweb when it comes to video. After all, don&#8217;t the numbers show that 97 per cent of all Olympic content-watching <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/14/nbc-internt-video-streaming-numbers-great-but/4686">took place</a> on the tube? (Let&#8217;s leave aside the fact that watching anything online at NBC requires you to use Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight, which only works on Windows). So the Internet, in other words, is nothing but a rounding error.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s natural enough that Zucker would put things in that perspective. After all, his salary comes from network television advertising, of which he just finished pulling in a billion dollars worth, so it&#8217;s understandable that he would be a little smug. But I think Jeff would be wise to remember one thing: the Olympics aren&#8217;t like regular television. They come along once every four years, and they are a massive social phenomenon unlike almost anything else that you can think of when it comes to TV viewing, as Cory Bergman at Lost Remote <a href="http://www.lostremote.com/2008/08/15/broadcast-rules-says-fox/">also points out</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-2593"></span></p>
<p>Is the bulk of TV viewing still happening on the tube? Sure it is. But that number is shrinking, and even the TV watching that does happen is changing, thanks to DVRs and time-shifting and so on &#8212; not to mention BitTorrent and other solutions to network intransigence. Maybe with the Olympics, networks can get away with shelving the opening ceremonies <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/sports/olympics/09nbc.html">for 12 hours</a> or whatever it was, but not with much else. To extrapolate from the viewer numbers for the Olympics and reach the conclusion that network television has no problems would be the height of hubris. I hope Zucker&#8217;s Olympic after-glow doesn&#8217;t last too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/15/zucker-is-wrong-to-be-so-smug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

