<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Legless chihuahuas and social media</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/22/legless-chihuahuas-and-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/22/legless-chihuahuas-and-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/22/legless-chihuahuas-and-social-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of commentary on Techmeme today about Google&#8217;s new Hot Trends feature, which builds on the search engine&#8217;s previous Trends and Zeitgeist features by adding news and blog posts. Many people seem to pay particularly attention to the absurd or stupid things that people search for, including &#8220;legless chihuahuas&#8221; and &#8220;nose bidet.&#8221; Fair enough. Don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F05%2F22%2Flegless-chihuahuas-and-social-media%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F05%2F22%2Flegless-chihuahuas-and-social-media%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Lots of commentary <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/070522/p77#a070522p77">on Techmeme today</a> about Google&#8217;s new Hot Trends feature, which builds on the search engine&#8217;s previous Trends and Zeitgeist features by adding news and blog posts. Many people seem to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/legless-chihuahuas-prove-google-hot-trends-not-so-hot/">pay particularly attention</a> to the absurd or <a href="http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/05/22/if-this-is-what-the-world-is-interested-in-god-help-us-all/">stupid things</a> that people search for, including &#8220;legless chihuahuas&#8221; and &#8220;nose bidet.&#8221;</p>
<p><img class="left" src='http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/chihuahua.jpg' alt='chihuahua.jpg' />Fair enough. Don&#8217;t get me wrong. There&#8217;s no question that people search for plenty of ridiculous stuff &#8212; and yes, the Trends include lots of stuff about World of Warcraft, etc. But still, I think dismissing Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?sa=X">Hot Trends</a> as a throwaway toy or a sideshow is missing something. And I think search guru Danny Sullivan made the point <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/22/legless-chihuahuas-prove-google-hot-trends-not-so-hot/#comment-1388583">in a comment on</a> Duncan Riley&#8217;s post at TechCrunch made the point pretty well: &#8220;legless chihuahuas,&#8221; he pointed out, were in the news; Oprah referred to a &#8220;nose bidet&#8221; on her show; and one of the other search terms was a radio contest question.</p>
<p>In other words, browsing through the search terms is a pretty good barometer of what people are interested in at a given moment. When I looked at the terms, Justis Richert was a popular term &#8212; because the porn actress who was born with that name happened to perform&#8230; well, a <i>service</i> for a state trooper <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/05/22/ap3748552.html">while he was on duty</a> (and still wound up getting a ticket, apparently). In other words, it was sparked by another news story.</p>
<p>Anyone who has spent any time running a news-related website knows that there are the stories you <i>wish</i> people were interested in, and then there are the ones that they really <i>are</i> interested in &#8212; and they aren&#8217;t always the same thing. For better or worse, Google&#8217;s Hot Trends and other traffic-measuring tools are a glimpse inside the mind of the people formerly known as the audience (as Jay Rosen <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html">called them</a>). Get used to it.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>A commenter here notes that Google&#8217;s Hot Trends could pose some competition for Technorati &#8212; and it certainly could for Technorati&#8217;s <a href="http://technorati.com/wtf">WTF</a> (Where&#8217;s The Fire) feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/22/legless-chihuahuas-and-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

