<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; street+level</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/streetlevel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Maps, satellite photos and Grand Theft Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/28/maps-satellite-photos-and-grand-theft-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/28/maps-satellite-photos-and-grand-theft-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street+level]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/28/maps-satellite-photos-and-grand-theft-stupid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb here and disagree with Mike Arrington, who calls the new Microsoft Live Local street-level photo thingamajig a &#8220;killer&#8221; in one of his typically breathless posts on TechCrunch, in which he says it will help Microsoft&#8217;s Live.com continue to &#8220;crush&#8221; others in the Web 2.0 portal game. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F28%2Fmaps-satellite-photos-and-grand-theft-stupid%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F28%2Fmaps-satellite-photos-and-grand-theft-stupid%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb here and disagree with Mike Arrington, who calls the new Microsoft Live Local <a href="http://preview.local.live.com/">street-level photo thingamajig</a> a &#8220;killer&#8221; in one of his typically breathless <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/28/killer-new-livecom-service-street-side/">posts on TechCrunch</a>, in which he says it will help Microsoft&#8217;s <a href="http://Live.com" title="http://Live.com" target="_blank">Live.com</a> continue to &#8220;crush&#8221; others in the Web 2.0 portal game. I tend to agree with David Galbraith, who suggests quite succinctly that the drive-by map feature <a href="http://www.davidgalbraith.org/archives/001017.html">is total bollocks</a> and that the Microsoft team have &#8220;lost the plot.&#8221; I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself.</p>
<p>The interface, as David points out, is ridiculous &#8211; a cheesy, video-game style rendering of a car&#8217;s cockpit, which you can switch from a regular car to a race car (complete with fire extinguisher). Quirky and fun? Maybe. I would add &#8220;stupid and useless&#8221; to that list as well though. As one commenter <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/28/killer-new-livecom-service-street-side/#comment-15506">noted on TechCrunch</a>, &#8220;not sure what use I would have for something like this.&#8221; A fair point. Not to mention, of course, that Amazon&#8217;s A9 launched a similar <a href="http://news.com.com/Amazon+A9+takes+it+to+the+streets/2100-1032_3-5833916.html">street-level photo</a> feature about six months ago. True, it doesn&#8217;t let you &#8220;drive&#8221; your virtual &#8220;car&#8221; down the streets, but I actually see that as a positive rather than a negative.</p>
<p>Now if Microsoft could somehow add virtual people to the streets and let you mow them down like in <a href="http://www.rockstargames.com/sanandreas/">Grand Theft Auto</a> or <a href="http://games.sci.co.uk/games/basic.asp?version_id=6">Carmaggedon</a> &#8211; that would be cool. After all, it is called a &#8220;street-side drive-by.&#8221; But it would still be useless for mapping or finding your way anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/28/maps-satellite-photos-and-grand-theft-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

