<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; song</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/song/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scientist reconstructs Guthrie bootleg</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/13/scientist-reconstructs-guthrie-bootleg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/13/scientist-reconstructs-guthrie-bootleg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootleg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guthrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[song]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/13/scientist-reconstructs-guthrie-bootleg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Masnick at Techdirt points to a fascinating piece that I also came across earlier today, which describes how a mathematician helped win a Grammy &#8212; by using algorithms to restore an ancient bootleg of legendary folk singer Woody Guthrie singing a tune. The recording was so old, and the device used to record it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F02%2F13%2Fscientist-reconstructs-guthrie-bootleg%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F02%2F13%2Fscientist-reconstructs-guthrie-bootleg%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Mike Masnick at Techdirt <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080211/225538236.shtml">points to</a> a fascinating piece that I also came across earlier today, which describes how a mathematician helped win a Grammy &#8212; by using algorithms to <a href="http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20080209/mathtrek.asp">restore an ancient bootleg</a> of legendary folk singer Woody Guthrie singing a tune. The recording was so old, and the device used to record it so fragile, that it had to be painstakingly reconstructed using a fascinating process.</p>
<p>As Mike notes, it&#8217;s ironic that everyone is so happy to have what amounts to an illegal copy of Guthrie&#8217;s song &#8212; and also notes how the Guthrie estate has been less than enthusiastic about sharing the legend&#8217;s music, despite Guthrie&#8217;s own views on copyright. But the thing that really struck me as ironic, as I mentioned in <a href="http://techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20080211/225538236#c20">a comment</a> on Mike&#8217;s post, is that I listened to both copies of the song, and I actually prefer the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/13/scientist-reconstructs-guthrie-bootleg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rolling Stone&#8217;s &quot;most annoying song ever&quot; awards</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/07/04/rolling-stones-most-annoying-song-ever-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/07/04/rolling-stones-most-annoying-song-ever-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackeyed_peas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[song]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/07/04/rolling-stones-most-annoying-song-ever-awards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rolling Stone magazine has released the hotly-awaited (by me at least) list of the top 20 most annoying songs. Number one: My Humps by the Black-Eyed Peas. Yup, that sounds about right. Glad to see Who Let The Dogs Out and My Heart Will Go On in there as well, although I think Celine should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F07%2F04%2Frolling-stones-most-annoying-song-ever-awards%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F07%2F04%2Frolling-stones-most-annoying-song-ever-awards%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img class="left" src='http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/snipshot_e4d0mbwp706.jpg' alt='snipshot_e4d0mbwp706.jpg' />Rolling Stone magazine has released the hotly-awaited (by me at least) list of the <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2007/07/02/the-20-most-annoying-songs/">top 20 most annoying</a> songs. Number one: <em>My Humps</em> by the Black-Eyed Peas. Yup, that sounds about right. Glad to see <em>Who Let The Dogs Out</em> and <em>My Heart Will Go On</em> in there as well, although I think Celine should have tied for first. The Crash Test Dummies (a fine Winnipeg band) also make an appearance for <em>Mmm mmm mmm mmm</em> or whatever it&#8217;s called, and so does Wham! for <em>Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go</em> (hat tip to <a href="http://thelistenerd.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/beps-update-most-annoying-song-ever/">ListeNerd</a> for the link)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/07/04/rolling-stones-most-annoying-song-ever-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

