<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; rollyo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/rollyo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rollyo and Swicki feel the giant&#8217;s breath</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/23/rollyo-and-swicki-feel-the-giants-breath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/23/rollyo-and-swicki-feel-the-giants-breath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rollyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swicki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/23/rollyo-and-swicki-feel-the-giants-breath/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Google has launched its personalized search tool (but it&#8217;s not called Google Co-op as Mike Arrington says at TechCrunch, it&#8217;s just one of the things that falls under the Google Co-op banner). The tool allows anyone to build a CSE or customized search engine and then not only share it &#8212; and make money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F10%2F23%2Frollyo-and-swicki-feel-the-giants-breath%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F10%2F23%2Frollyo-and-swicki-feel-the-giants-breath%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>Google has launched its <a href="http://www.google.com/coop/cse/">personalized search tool</a> (but it&#8217;s not called Google Co-op as Mike Arrington <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/23/google-custom-search-tomorrow/">says</a> at TechCrunch, it&#8217;s just one of the things that falls under the Google Co-op banner). The tool allows anyone to build a CSE or customized search engine and then not only share it &#8212; and make money from Google AdSense on the search pages &#8212; but allows them to continually update it by using a toolbar bookmarklet called the Marker. </p>
<p>Matt Cutts has a <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/review-custom-search-engine/">good breakdown</a> of how it works, while Om says Google <a href="http://gigaom.com/2006/10/23/google-custom-search/">should be</a> compensating CSE creators with more than the usual AdSense dosh.</p>
<p><b>Original post:</b></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a53ea278-62e9-11db-8faa-0000779e2340.html">a report</a> in the Financial Times, Google will be launching a customized search tool on Tuesday, one that can be embedded in a webpage and will search inside websites you specify. Not only that, but you can apparently add new sites to your custom search index as you surf, by tagging pages with a keyword. This is something that Google sleuth Garrett Rogers hinted at <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=334">not long ago</a>, after poking around in Google&#8217;s code.</p>
<p>When I read the headline of the FT story, the first thing I thought of was <a href="http://Rollyo.com" title="http://Rollyo.com" target="_blank">Rollyo.com</a>, and the second thing I thought of was <a href="http://Swicki.com" title="http://Swicki.com" target="_blank">Swicki.com</a>. Both are services that allow you to produce &#8212; or &#8220;roll your own&#8221; &#8212; customized search engine. I have tried and like both tools, which have some differences (Swicki lets you create a tag cloud of search terms and Rollyo has a built-in site search) but I removed them both for a variety of reasons. Are their days numbered now that Google has appeared on the scene?</p>
<p><center><img src="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/teeth.jpg" alt="shark" /></center></p>
<p>Some might recall that this discussion has occurred before, with a Web-based calendar called Kiko. When Google Calendar appeared, Kiko quickly decided it wasn&#8217;t worth going up against a $130-billion behemoth &#8212; a decision Paul Graham <a href="http://paulgraham.infogami.com/blog/kiko">said</a> was the right one and David at 37signals implied was the <a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/archives2/google_does_not_render_resistance_futile.php">wrong one</a> &#8212; and sold itself on eBay (and was eventually bought by Toronto&#8217;s own Tucows). Will Rollyo or Swicki be making the same decision?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/23/rollyo-and-swicki-feel-the-giants-breath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

