<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; qumana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/qumana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft gettin&#8217; all bloggy with it</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/13/microsoft-gettin-all-bloggy-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/13/microsoft-gettin-all-bloggy-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live+writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qumana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/13/microsoft-gettin-all-bloggy-with-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much as I&#8217;m conditioned to dislike Microsoft products, which in general are bug-ridden and overly-controlling pieces of bloatware (not to put too fine a point on it) I&#8217;ll be interested to see whether the company&#8217;s new blog tool, Windows Live Writer, can live up to some of its early billing. Why? Because I have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F08%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-gettin-all-bloggy-with-it%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F08%2F13%2Fmicrosoft-gettin-all-bloggy-with-it%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Much as I&#8217;m conditioned to dislike Microsoft products, which in general are bug-ridden and overly-controlling pieces of bloatware (not to put too fine a point on it) I&#8217;ll be interested to see whether the company&#8217;s <a href="http://windowslivewriter.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D85741BB5E0BE8AA!174.entry">new blog tool</a>, Windows Live Writer, can live up to some of its early billing. Why? Because I have to admit that having tried most of the tools out there &#8212; including the Performancing extension for Firefox, w.bloggar, Canada&#8217;s own <a href="http://Qumana.com" title="http://Qumana.com" target="_blank">Qumana.com</a> and several others &#8212; I have yet to find one that does everything I want it to. Could Microsoft have what it takes? Stranger things have happened. And let&#8217;s face it, Microsoft is pretty good at taking all the features other companies have come up with and aggregating them.</p>
<p>So far, Om seems <a href="http://software.gigaom.com/2006/08/13/windows-live-writer-write-on/">pretty excited</a> about Live Writer, <a href="http://evans.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2006/8/13/2227967.html">Mark </a> has given it a good early review, and Elliot Back seems to <a href="http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/08/13/windows-live-writer-review/">think</a> it does a pretty good job too. My friend Paul Kedrosky, however &#8212; who is no slouch in the software programming department himself, having put together one of the first blogging platforms back in his GrokSoup days &#8212; is less than enthused, saying it is buggy and <a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2006/08/13/windows_live_wr.html">not very smart</a> when it comes to configuring itself for his blog. I have to admit that his description sounds a lot more like the Microsoft software I&#8217;m used to, particularly when it comes to the early versions of the company&#8217;s products (please don&#8217;t send Steve Ballmer over to my house to convince me I&#8217;m wrong, he always winds up breaking something).</p>
<p>In any case, I&#8217;m going to give it a try because I&#8217;m still looking for the right tool. As it stands now, I mostly use the Web interface to my WordPress blog to write posts, because it&#8217;s just easier that way. I can enter HTML directly if I want without having to screw around with a GUI posting interface, and uploading and inserting pictures is a breeze. I had problems with both of those things when I used Qumana and <a href="http://Performancing.com" title="http://Performancing.com" target="_blank">Performancing.com</a>, although I must say the latter was handy because it was integrated right in the browser &#8212; and there I have to agree with Paul that having another app I have to install on every machine doesn&#8217;t really appeal to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/08/13/microsoft-gettin-all-bloggy-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

