<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; protest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/protest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Last.fm&#8217;s non-silence speaks volumes</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/26/lastfms-non-silence-speaks-volumes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/26/lastfms-non-silence-speaks-volumes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/26/lastfms-non-silence-speaks-volumes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I hate to jump on the whole &#8220;Day The Music Died&#8221; thing &#8212; which I think is a little over the top &#8212; I find it interesting that while a whole bunch of Web radio companies, including Yahoo Music and Pandora, are turning off their streams in order to protest the increase in licensing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F06%2F26%2Flastfms-non-silence-speaks-volumes%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F06%2F26%2Flastfms-non-silence-speaks-volumes%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Although I hate to jump on the whole &#8220;Day The Music Died&#8221; thing &#8212; which I think is a little over the top &#8212; I find it interesting that while a whole bunch of Web radio companies, including <a href="http://yodel.yahoo.com/2007/06/25/yahoo-music-goes-radio-silent/">Yahoo Music and Pandora</a>, are turning off their streams in order to protest the increase in licensing fees for Web broadcasting, Last.fm has <a href="http://blog.last.fm/2007/06/25/make-some-noise">decided not to</a>, which has caused some consternation in the blogosphere, including <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/22/lastfm-not-joining-national-day-of-silence">this post</a> at TechCrunch by Duncan Riley.</p>
<p><img class="left" src='http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/snipshot_e47fptthesl.jpg' alt='snipshot_e47fptthesl.jpg' />Riley says that the Last.fm decision could risk a backlash from users, and in a follow-up post at TechCrunch, Mike Arrington <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/good-for-yahoo-and-everyone-else-except-lastfm/">raises the issue</a> of whether the company&#8217;s decision has something to do with it having become part of CBS, the media conglomerate that <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-cbs-lastfm-think-community-not-just-music/">bought it</a> for $280-million not too long ago. Last.fm, in a blog post <a href="http://blog.last.fm/2007/06/25/make-some-noise">in its defence</a>, says: <em>&#8220;We do not want to punish our listeners for our problems, period.&#8221;</em> The company argues that royalty rates are a fact of life, and that because it is based in the UK it has had to deal with them for a long time, etc. It says the industry should fight for fairness, but that turning off Internet radio even for a day <em>&#8220;is just plain wrong.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>While the idea that users should come first is an appealing one &#8212; and companies like <a href="http://craigslist.org" title="http://craigslist.org" target="_blank">craigslist.org</a> have certainly prospered by making it a mantra &#8212; Last.fm&#8217;s argument seems a little disingenuous. If the doubling of radio royalty rates takes effect (Stan Schroeder at Frantic Industries has a <a href="http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/06/25/internet-radio-dies-today/">nice overview</a> of the issues, as does the <a href="http://www.savenetradio.org/">SaveNetRadio site</a>), small streaming companies could go under. That would obviously leave Last.fm in a pretty sweet position.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s why Last.fm made the decision it did. I don&#8217;t know the company or the founders, so I can&#8217;t judge. I&#8217;m just saying it looks kind of fishy &#8212; especially when <a href="http://ymusicblog.com/blog/2007/06/26/yahoo-music-goes-radio-silent/">Yahoo</a> and RealNetworks and others have joined the protest. Turning off the stream for a single day doesn&#8217;t seem like a huge issue to make a point, and I would bet that Last.fm&#8217;s users would probably support the move.</p>
<p>(Incidentally, Pandora has been inaccessible to Canadians for more than a month, after the company <a href="http://blog.pandora.com/pandora/archives/2007/05/canada.html">turned off access</a> to Canadian IP addresses because it couldn&#8217;t afford to reach licensing deals with all the record labels for Canada as well as the U.S.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/26/lastfms-non-silence-speaks-volumes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

