<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; offline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/offline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Look ma, my docs are in the cloud!</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/look-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/look-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to see that Google has finally launched offline access for Google Documents &#8212; or at least for text documents anyway (apparently presentations and spreadsheets are coming later). I guess we should be grateful, although I still have to wonder why Zoho has had offline capability for its document-sharing service since way back in November [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F03%2F31%2Flook-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F03%2F31%2Flook-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Nice to see that Google has finally launched offline access for Google Documents &#8212; or at least for text documents anyway (apparently presentations and spreadsheets <a href="http://googledocs.blogspot.com/2008/03/bringing-cloud-with-you.html">are coming later</a>). I guess we should be grateful, although I still have to wonder why Zoho has had offline capability for its document-sharing service since way back in <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/26/zoho-writer-where-the-hell-is-google/">November sometime</a>, which is based on Google Gears. I thought having inside knowledge of features helped companies triumph over their competitors &#8212; or is that the kind of thing that only works for Microsoft?</p>
<p>Late to the party or not, I still think Google is the one to beat. Zoho&#8217;s services are great, and I use Zoho Show in particular a fair bit, but when it comes to trusting a company with my data I would have to come down on the side of Google. Doesl being a multibillion-dollar company mean that they won&#8217;t be <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/15/what-happens-when-the-cloud-is-down/">vulnerable to outages</a> that take down the cloud? Hardly. But I expect them to have some pretty mean backups and redundancies, thanks to those 600,000 servers they have in warehouse farms around the world (or however many they are up to now).</p>
<p>Some &#8212; including <a href="http://www.lastpodcast.net/2008/03/31/google-docs-now-available-offline-through-gears/">Frederic of The Last Podcast</a> &#8212; say the sharing part of Google Docs doesn&#8217;t interest them much, and that they need features that only an offline or desktop version of a word processor can offer. I have to say I don&#8217;t need the latter, and I think the former is a critical feature, especially as companies try to make it easier for their employees to collaborate and become more creative. (Note: Rafe Needleman at Webware <a href="http://www.webware.com/8301-1_109-9906648-2.html">points out that</a> Mozilla is planning to build this feature into its browser).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/look-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoho Writer: Where the hell is Google?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/26/zoho-writer-where-the-hell-is-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/26/zoho-writer-where-the-hell-is-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoho]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/26/zoho-writer-where-the-hell-is-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Zoho &#8212; the online Office-style productivity suite company &#8212; has launched offline support for its Zoho Writer word-processing feature/service, which I quite like (I also use their presentation app, Zoho Show, which is excellent). Digital Inspiration originally broke the story, but Mike has some details at TechCrunch too. As Eric Eldon at VentureBeat notes, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F11%2F26%2Fzoho-writer-where-the-hell-is-google%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F11%2F26%2Fzoho-writer-where-the-hell-is-google%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>So Zoho &#8212; the online Office-style productivity suite company &#8212; has <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/25/zoho-writer-now-lets-you-edit-documents-offline/">launched offline support</a> for its Zoho Writer word-processing feature/service, which I quite like (I also use their presentation app, Zoho Show, which is excellent). <a href="http://www.labnol.org/internet/office/use-online-office-offline-with-google-gears/1843/">Digital Inspiration</a> originally broke the story, but Mike has some details <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/26/while-live-documents-yaps-zoho-delivers/">at TechCrunch too</a>.</p>
<p>As Eric Eldon at VentureBeat notes, Zoho has allowed users of Zoho Writer to read their documents offline for some time now, but not to edit them and then sync them later when they get online again. It has now added the latter feature, thanks to Google&#8217;s <a href="http://gears.google.com/">&#8220;Gears&#8221;</a> technology, which allows online/offline syncing and which Google already uses in <a href="http://reader.google.com">Google Reader</a>.</p>
<p>My only question is this: Why on earth can&#8217;t we do the same thing with <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a>? Google Gears has been out in the marketplace for months, and presumably was internally available for months before that. And we can already use it in Google Reader (although it isn&#8217;t much use with a dial-up connection, let me tell you). </p>
<p>So why can little Zoho somehow manage to <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zoho_on_gears.php">integrate Google Gears</a> and its document-editing features, but Google can&#8217;t? What the heck are all those PhDs doing over there at the Googleplex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/26/zoho-writer-where-the-hell-is-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoho offline: Is being first enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/21/zoho-offline-is-being-first-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/21/zoho-offline-is-being-first-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoho]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/21/zoho-offline-is-being-first-enough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Mike Arrington points out at TechCrunch, Zoho has launched offline support for its Zoho Writer application (although it&#8217;s read-only for now) using Google Gears &#8212; which is more than a little ironic, considering Google still hasn&#8217;t offered the same functionality for Google Docs. But while that irony makes for a funny post, does it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F08%2F21%2Fzoho-offline-is-being-first-enough%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F08%2F21%2Fzoho-offline-is-being-first-enough%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>As Mike Arrington <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/zoho-goes-offline-in-a-good-way/">points out at TechCrunch</a>, Zoho has launched offline support for its Zoho Writer application (although it&#8217;s read-only for now) using Google Gears &#8212; which is more than a little ironic, considering Google still hasn&#8217;t offered the same functionality for Google Docs. </p>
<p>But while that irony makes for a funny post, does it really amount to anything from a competitive point of view? I&#8217;m not so sure it does. Implementing Gears support for Google Docs would probably take about half an hour of programming time &#8212; and in all likelihood requires little more than a piece of script to be turned on. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question that having offline support is a key feature, and Zoho should be congratulated for offering it. But Is being first enough to give it any kind of compelling advantage over Google Docs? Unlikely. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/08/21/zoho-offline-is-being-first-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

