<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; Meebo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/meebo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meebo: Chat rooms are so 1998</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/31/meebo-chat-rooms-are-so-1998/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/31/meebo-chat-rooms-are-so-1998/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/31/meebo-chat-rooms-are-so-1998/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m having some trouble getting excited about the announcement that Meebo Rooms can now be easily embedded into websites and blog pages (you could embed them before, apparently, but it wasn&#8217;t easy). I get the fact that Meebo.com makes it easy to chat, and I know that its Web-based IM service is hugely popular &#8212; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having some trouble getting excited about <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/31/meebo-turns-chat-rooms-into-a-web-service/">the announcement</a> that Meebo Rooms can now be easily embedded into websites and blog pages (you could embed them before, apparently, but it wasn&#8217;t easy). I get the fact that Meebo.com makes it easy to chat, and I know that its Web-based IM service is hugely popular &#8212; particularly with people who have instant messaging blocked at work or school, as many of us do.</p>
<p>But the whole &#8220;embedded chat room&#8221; thing just doesn&#8217;t work for me. Maybe it&#8217;s because there have been &#8212; and are &#8212; dozens of companies doing pretty much the same thing, including 3bubbles.com (remember them?), Gabbly, Mobber and a whack of others with equally ridiculous and forgettable names. Heck, my friend Brent Ashley whipped up an Ajax chat room widget <a href="http://www.ashleyit.com/blogs/brentashley/category/blogchat/">back in 2002</a> called BlogChat. It&#8217;s not technically that hard (no offense, Brent), so what is compelling about it?</p>
<p>I guess like Pete Cashmore, who wrote about 3bubbles when it came out, I <a href="http://mashable.com/?p=346">just don&#8217;t get</a> the whole dedicated chat room idea. Most of the chat room apps I&#8217;ve tried on various sites (including mine) wind up filled with idiots, or are ghost towns where there hasn&#8217;t been a chat message for weeks, and the last one was someone typing &#8220;Hi, is anyone here?&#8221; I could see it for a dedicated situation such as a conference or some other compelling event, but how many of those could there be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/31/meebo-chat-rooms-are-so-1998/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
