<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; Louis Gray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/louis-gray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m glad Louis Gray called out Mashable</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a big fan of the Mashable blog by Pete Cashmore. They cover technology and the Web like no other blog, and they have some great writers &#8212; like Adam Ostrow, Mark &#8220;Rizzn&#8221; Hopkins, Kristen Nicole and others &#8212; but something has always kind of bothered me about the site, and I&#8217;m glad that Louis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F01%2F20%2Fim-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F01%2F20%2Fim-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of the Mashable blog by Pete Cashmore. They cover technology and the Web like no other blog, and they have some great writers &#8212; like Adam Ostrow, Mark &#8220;Rizzn&#8221; Hopkins, Kristen Nicole and others &#8212; but something has always kind of bothered me about the site, and I&#8217;m glad that Louis Gray <a href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/01/mashable-uses-list-power-to-steal-b.html">finally wrote about it</a>: Mashable often isn&#8217;t that great at giving credit to the blogs and writers who found an item first.</p>
<p>In his post, Louis is quite rightly upset about a couple of scoops he got, involving the site Readburner and another similar site called Shared Reader. <a href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/01/mashable-uses-list-power-to-steal-b.html">In the first case</a>, Mashable wrote about the site and gave him no credit whatsoever &#8212; not even a link. In the second case, Louis says that Mashable wrote an item and put a small &#8220;via&#8221; link at the bottom, something they often do. While this is a link, Louis is right that it&#8217;s not very prominent and is easily missed. But at least it&#8217;s a link.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/01/mashable-uses-list-power-to-steal-b.html">other example</a> he uses is pretty outrageous, however: Louis says a quote he got from Robert Scoble was lifted from his post and used in a Mashable post without any link or attribution whatsoever. I think everyone would agree that taking quotes is pretty offside. Pete has responded in the comments to Louis&#8217;s post, and says he is reviewing the site&#8217;s linking policies, but he doesn&#8217;t say anything about the quote (although the post <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/01/15/scobles-new-show/">has been updated</a> with attribution).</p>
<p>Attribution is something that has been &#8212; and is still &#8212; a long-running debate in traditional media as well. Television stations &#8220;rip and read&#8221; newspaper stories, but newspapers themselves routinely take articles from wire services like Reuters or Associated Press and use virtually the entire thing, but put their own writer&#8217;s byline on it. Sometimes they put a small &#8220;with files from&#8221; at the end of the story.</p>
<p>The fact that you can link on the Internet is one of the most powerful forces there is. A link from Mashable can help people find new blogs such as Louis&#8217;s, and they shouldn&#8217;t be stingy with their attribution &#8212; and they definitely shouldn&#8217;t be lifting quotes holus-bolus. I hope Pete and his team can set a good example for others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/01/20/im-glad-louis-gray-called-out-mashable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

