<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; lifecast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/lifecast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are we ready for Natalie.tv&#063;</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/08/are-we-ready-for-natalietv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/08/are-we-ready-for-natalietv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 01:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natalie-portman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/08/are-we-ready-for-natalietv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valleywag says that Natalie Portman is working on a &#8220;lifecast&#8221; of her personal and working life, a la Justin.tv&#8216;s 24-hour streaming EdTV experiment. Said news, apparently, was leaked via a Twitter message by someone whose firm had been approached to fund her new venture (allegedly Silicon Valley VC oufit Charles River Ventures). This wouldn&#8217;t be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F05%2F08%2Fare-we-ready-for-natalietv%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F05%2F08%2Fare-we-ready-for-natalietv%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><img class="left" src='http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/snipshot_e4jpq70bjvm.jpg' alt='snipshot_e4jpq70bjvm.jpg' />Valleywag says that Natalie Portman <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/exclusive/natalie-portmans-lifecast-258610.php">is working on</a> a &#8220;lifecast&#8221; of her personal and working life, a la <a href="http://Justin.tv" title="http://Justin.tv" target="_blank">Justin.tv</a>&#8216;s 24-hour streaming EdTV experiment. Said news, apparently, was leaked via a Twitter message by someone whose firm had been approached to fund her new venture (allegedly Silicon Valley VC oufit Charles River Ventures). This wouldn&#8217;t be the only time that Silicon Valley has met Silicone Valley, of course, but it still seems a little far-fetched to me &#8212; but then, so did <a href="http://justin.tv">Justin.tv</a>. And Natalie has shown that she is happy to mess around with her public image from time to time, as you can see from <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=2nG129bAsMU">this hilarious video clip</a> from Saturday Night Live. </p>
<p>And why not stream video yourself? If you&#8217;re Brittany or Lindsay or Paris, you either spend all of your time trying to get on TV or in the newspaper, or you find yourself hounded by photographers and video-cameras trying to put you there anyway. Why not take control of the process? And if you think no one would subscribe to an all-Natalie channel, I expect that you are quite wrong. I think my friend Steve Bryant <a href="http://www.reelpopblog.com/2007/05/portman_lifecas.html">agrees with me</a>.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>Liz Gannes at NewTeeVee got a comment from Susan Wu at Charles River, who said the Twitter message was just a joke. And NewTeeVee also came up with <a href="http://newteevee.com/2007/05/09/lifecasters-we-would-actually-watch/">a list of celebrities</a> it would like to see do a lifecast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/08/are-we-ready-for-natalietv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

