<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; kent+newsome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/kentnewsome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An attempt at Kent&#8217;s &#8220;second opinion&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gatekeepers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kent+newsome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second+opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My blogging friend Kent Newsome had a great idea recently (I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s just the latest of many). After all the talk about gatekeepers and how A-listers such as Doc Searls could do more by linking to unknown bloggers, Kent decided to start a feature he called &#8220;second opinion,&#8221; in which he singled out and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F19%2Fan-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F19%2Fan-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>My blogging friend <a href="http://www.newsome.org">Kent Newsome</a> had a great idea recently (I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s just the latest of many). After all the talk about gatekeepers and how A-listers such as <a href="http://doc.weblogs.com">Doc Searls</a> could do more by linking to unknown bloggers, Kent decided to start a feature he called &#8220;second opinion,&#8221; in which he <a href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/proposal-second-opinion.shtml">singled out and linked to</a> a lesser-known blogger with a good post on a particular topic. Doc has called this <a href="http://doc.weblogs.com/2006/02/18#affirmativeTraction">&#8220;affirmative traction.&#8221;</a> (Nice one, Doc).</p>
<p>I think this is a fantastic idea. For all the whining from B-listers and C-listers and Z-listers about how no one links to poor old them, very few go out of their way to link to bloggers who are even lesser known than they are. I know this is kind of cheating, but as my first attempt at doing this, I&#8217;m actually going to pick someone I found through <a href="http://www.newsome.org">Kent&#8217;s blog</a> &#8211; except that he didn&#8217;t link to this person as an example of a second opinion, he linked to them because they agreed with his suggestion and mentioned it on their blog. So who is it? It&#8217;s Dave Wallace of Australia, who writes two good blogs &#8211; one called <a href="http://lifekludger.net">Lifekludger</a>, and a personal one called <a href="http://www.dnwallace.com/blog/">Blob</a>.</p>
<p>I went to Dave&#8217;s blog to check out what he said about Kent&#8217;s idea, but then I read <a href="http://dnwallace.com/blog/2006/02/17/equality-on-the-blogosphere-no-gaping-voids/">this post</a>, which was about equality on the blogosphere, and how there plenty of tools for grouping <a href="http://tech.memeorandum.com">the same dozen or so blogs</a> together around topics, but there aren&#8217;t enough that allow you to find the lesser-known voices &#8211; kind of like Kent is trying to do. I thought Dave put it quite well. While looking around his blog (because I&#8217;m a nosy journalist), I discovered that Dave also writes Lifekludger, which is about the tools he uses to make it easier to do things, since he has been a <a href="http://lifekludger.net/about-me/">C4 quadraplegic</a> for the last 25 years or so.</p>
<p>Dave&#8217;s blogs aren&#8217;t exactly the bottom of the Z-list &#8211; Lifekludger is number 342,900 in the <a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/lifekludger.net">Technorati rankings</a> with 30 links from 8 sites, and Blob is number 255,753 with <a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/dnwallace.com%2Fblog">30 links from 11 sites</a>. But I still think he could use a boost, and I&#8217;m happy to do my part to help him get more readers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/19/an-attempt-at-kents-second-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

