<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; journalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/journalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bloggers need to try even harder</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/17/bloggers-need-to-try-even-harder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/17/bloggers-need-to-try-even-harder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/17/bloggers-need-to-try-even-harder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Fred has an update on his post in which he makes it clear that he wasn&#8217;t picking on Matt or Erick, and he has also retired the term &#8220;journablogger.&#8221; And Mike Arrington has now come to the defence of Erick and Matt, and questioned Fred&#8217;s motives in posting what he did &#8212; although I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F02%2F17%2Fbloggers-need-to-try-even-harder%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F02%2F17%2Fbloggers-need-to-try-even-harder%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>Fred has <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/02/some-more-thoug.html">an update on his post</a> in which he makes it clear that he wasn&#8217;t picking on Matt or Erick, and he has also retired the term &#8220;journablogger.&#8221; And Mike Arrington has now come to the defence of Erick and Matt, and questioned Fred&#8217;s motives in posting what he did &#8212; although I think Mike overdoes it a little <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/17/fred-wilsons-conflicted-doublespeak/">in his post</a>. </p>
<p>Maybe Fred&#8217;s post was flawed (which he admits on his blog and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/17/fred-wilsons-conflicted-doublespeak/#comment-1996892">in a comment</a> at TechCrunch), but I still think it&#8217;s a worthwhile discussion to have. But then, I guess I&#8217;m a traditional journalist. Mike says he doesn&#8217;t care about being balanced, he <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/17/fred-wilsons-conflicted-doublespeak/#comment-1996887">just wants to be right</a>. I think that&#8217;s a natural impulse, but it can have unpleasant side-effects.</p>
<p><b>Original post:</b> </p>
<p>I have to give VC blogger Fred Wilson some props for calling out what he calls &#8220;journabloggers&#8221; like Mashable, VentureBeat, GigaOm, TechCrunch and so on. Fred&#8217;s point &#8212; one that others have made as well &#8212; is that it&#8217;s easy for such sites to <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/02/journabloggers.html">fall into the trap</a> of posting salacious headlines that aren&#8217;t fully backed up, whether because they want to be first, or because they simply want to boost traffic.</p>
<p>The example Fred uses is <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/17/likecom-shows-visual-search-works-after-all/">a VentureBeat post</a> about visual-search site <a href="http://Like.com" title="http://Like.com" target="_blank">Like.com</a> (formerly known as Riya), which Matt Marshall says has seen its traffic climb to the point where it is beating competitor ThisNext &#8212; a claim that Fred takes issue with. He also mentions a recent post from TechCrunch, and his point seems to be that Matt and Erick Schonfeld could have done a bit more research to back up some of their claims.</p>
<p>Matt seems like a stand-up guy, and I know Fred didn&#8217;t bring it up to pick on him, or on anyone else for that matter (and just to be clear, neither am I). I think it&#8217;s good to point out when the bloggers we read aren&#8217;t thinking things through fully or are falling short (and that includes me), provided it is done in a constructive way. The great part about the blogosphere &#8212; which Fred didn&#8217;t really mention &#8212; is that it&#8217;s easy to flesh out and/or correct a post when something like that happens.</p>
<p>VentureBeat, for example, responded to Fred&#8217;s concerns (which Matt <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/02/journabloggers.html#comment-156064">commented on</a> at Fred&#8217;s blog) and added them <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/17/likecom-shows-visual-search-works-after-all/">to the original post</a>. That&#8217;s a substantially better response than Fred would have gotten from traditional media, I expect. Steven Hodson at WinExtra makes a good point: if the top &#8220;journabloggers&#8221; get too comfortable or lazy, all that does is open up <a href="http://www.winextra.com/2008/02/17/a-golden-opportunity-for-bloggers/">opportunities for new ones</a>, which is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/17/bloggers-need-to-try-even-harder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

