<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; huffpost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/huffpost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>News satire is harder than it looks</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/09/news-satire-is-harder-than-it-looks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/09/news-satire-is-harder-than-it-looks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huffpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/09/news-satire-is-harder-than-it-looks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtually everyone thinks they&#8217;re funny &#8212; and the ones who think they&#8217;re the funniest are the ones who aren&#8217;t funny at all. Into that latter category, I would have to put the new &#8220;media satire&#8221; site 23/6 (which is apparently a play on the term 24/7 &#8212; but like the site itself, the name isn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F11%2F09%2Fnews-satire-is-harder-than-it-looks%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F11%2F09%2Fnews-satire-is-harder-than-it-looks%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Virtually everyone thinks they&#8217;re funny &#8212; and the ones who think they&#8217;re the funniest are the ones who aren&#8217;t funny at all. Into that latter category, I would have to put the new &#8220;media satire&#8221; site <a href="http://www.236.com">23/6</a> (which is apparently a play on the term 24/7 &#8212; but like the site itself, the name isn&#8217;t funny either). As Chris Albrecht <a href="http://newteevee.com/2007/11/09/236-some-of-the-news-none-of-the-funny/">points out at NewTeeVee</a>, the unfunnyness of the site is more than a little sad, considering that News Corp. and HuffingtonPost have apparently been working on this thing for more than a year now.</p>
<p>For some reason, everyone thinks that satire &#8212; particularly political or news-driven satire &#8212; is <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/blogging-for-dollars/iac-launches-236-a-fake-news-site-modeled-on-real-failures-320920.php">really easy to do</a>. After all, that guy Jon Stewart just sits there and reads the headlines and makes faces, and people think it&#8217;s hilarious, right? And The Onion gets away with murder too, just by writing takeoffs of popular news stories. How hard could that be?</p>
<p>Well, guess what. It&#8217;s really hard. It&#8217;s not that hard to do &#8212; it&#8217;s just really hard to do it <em>well</em>. After all, even <a href="http://theonion.com">The Onion</a> misses from time to time. Maybe 23/6 can get into the swing eventually, but you have to wonder why they even bothered. It&#8217;s not like the political or news-driven satire game doesn&#8217;t already have a bunch of players. Portfolio&#8217;s media blogger <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/mixed-media/2007/11/09/review-dillers-new-humor-site-busts-no-guts">doesn&#8217;t think much of it</a> either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/09/news-satire-is-harder-than-it-looks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

