<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; GooglePC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/googlepc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why on earth would Google do a PC?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/04/why-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/04/why-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 01:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoogleCube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GooglePC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/01/04/why-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a mountain of chatter on the Web about rumours that Google might announce a Google PC &#8211; rumours that got a new lease on life from a recent piece in the Los Angeles Times, although they have been around for a while. Those rumours, which have been tracked by CNet, have now been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F01%2F04%2Fwhy-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F01%2F04%2Fwhy-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>There&#8217;s been a mountain of chatter on the Web about rumours that Google might announce a Google PC &#8211; rumours that got a new lease on life from a recent piece <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-predict1jan01,0,3503327.story">in the Los Angeles Times</a>, although they have been around <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2005/12/11/is-a-google-pc-a-good-idea/">for a while</a>. Those rumours, which have been <a href="http://news.com.com/2061-10802_3-6016810.html">tracked by CNet</a>, have now been denied by a <a href="http://www.kraneland.com/2006/01/google-cube-google-pc.html">spokesman for the search giant</a>, and by Wal-Mart, which was supposed to be the company&#8217;s partner (along with Wyse Technologies).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tempting rumour in part because people seem to lust for a strong competitor for Microsoft &#8211; and what better competitor than a cash-rich company with a great brand and a market value that is <a href="http://screen.finance.yahoo.com/b?pr=5/&#038;mc=10000000000/&#038;z=mc&#038;db=stocks&#038;vw=1&#038;b=21">bigger than Coca-Cola</a> and Cisco Systems, and just behind IBM? A little Google cube with a version of Linux on it and some Web-based office software <a href="http://www.techshout.com/internet/2006/04/google-to-design-a-cut-price-pc-having-its-own-operating-system/">sounds so great</a>, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>The only downside is that it seems like a pretty stupid idea in a lot of ways, as <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20060104/1258203_F.shtml">Carlo at TechDirt</a> and <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002186.php">John Battelle</a> have both noted. Why should Google bother selling such a system, when it can just avoid all the cost and hassle by distributing software that does the same thing on other people&#8217;s computers? I just don&#8217;t see the point. Neither does <a href="http://saunderslog.com/2006/01/04/google-cube-remember-mike-cowpland/">Alec Saunders</a>, (who invokes the ghost of Michael Cowpland).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/01/04/why-on-earth-would-google-do-a-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

