<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; googlepages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/googlepages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hey look &#8211; it&#8217;s 1996 all over again</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/23/hey-look-its-1996-all-over-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/23/hey-look-its-1996-all-over-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlepages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page+creator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/23/hey-look-its-1996-all-over-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another Google product launch, and yet another collective yawn &#8211; or worse, a quizzical look and a shrug of the shoulders. What the heck is Google Page Creator supposed to be? You go there, type in some text, maybe drag an image, change the font, choose a template and away you go. Google publishes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F23%2Fhey-look-its-1996-all-over-again%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F23%2Fhey-look-its-1996-all-over-again%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Yet another Google product launch, and yet another collective yawn &#8211; or worse, a quizzical look and a shrug of the shoulders. What the heck is <a href="http://pages.google.com/">Google Page Creator</a> supposed to be? You go there, type in some text, maybe drag an image, change the font, choose a template and away you go. Google publishes and hosts the page at <a href="http://yourname.googlepages.com" title="http://yourname.googlepages.com" target="_blank">yourname.googlepages.com</a> and you get 100 megabytes of space. Does this sound at all familiar? It does to <a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2006/02/23/google-launches-geocities-the-2006-version/">The Blog Herald</a>, and to Jim Benson at <a href="http://ourfounder.typepad.com/leblog/2006/02/google_pages_re.html">J. LeRoy</a> and others &#8211; including me. It sounds like GeoCities.</p>
<p>Remember them? They were one of those great website-creation tools that sprang up in the late 1990s and quickly tried to outdo each other in the low-price, garish design sweepstakes. It got to a point where I refused to even go to a webpage if it had a <a href="http://GeoCities.com" title="http://GeoCities.com" target="_blank">GeoCities.com</a> address. Nevetheless, there were plenty of similar services &#8211; including TheGlobe, which saw the largest increase in market value ever on the day of an IPO. It later disappeared, but GeoCities was bought by none other than Yahoo <a href="http://money.cnn.com/1999/01/28/technology/yahoo_a/">for $3.6-billion</a>. </p>
<p>Apart from the use of AJAX, which makes it that much faster to create a crappy website, Google&#8217;s page creator is like going back in time. Richard MacManus of ZDNet <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=124">wonders whether</a> it isn&#8217;t part of a much-rumoured Google Office suite of some kind, a sort of proto-word processor. Matthew Gifford <a href="http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/02/23/page-creator-googles-stealth-word-processor/">feels the same</a>. But Nik Cubrilovic says it looks like just another lame product rolled out the door <a href="http://www.nik.com.au/archives/2006/02/23/another-google-miss/">with too little thought</a>, like Google Base or <a href="http://Froogle.com" title="http://Froogle.com" target="_blank">Froogle.com</a>, and I must say I&#8217;m leaning in that direction myself. Maybe it&#8217;s part of a larger strategy, but if so then the rest of the strategy better look pretty damn good, because this is lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/23/hey-look-its-1996-all-over-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

