<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook appears to be down</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/29/facebook-appears-to-be-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/29/facebook-appears-to-be-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/29/facebook-appears-to-be-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t been able to log in to the site for the past few hours, and it seems as though some other people have had trouble too. Growing pains? and&#8230; we&#8217;re back. Life can return to normal :-) Update: Just got an email from Matt Hicks, who&#8217;s in communications with Facebook, and he said there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F06%2F29%2Ffacebook-appears-to-be-down%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F06%2F29%2Ffacebook-appears-to-be-down%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been able to log in to the site for the past few hours, and it seems as though <a href="http://www.kinggary.com/archives/i-cant-login-to-facebook-for-a-few-hours/">some</a> other <a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=363689">people</a> have had <a href="http://www.zillwood.com/jim/?p=258">trouble</a> too. Growing pains?</p>
<p>and&#8230; we&#8217;re back. Life can return to normal   :-)</p>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>Just got an email from Matt Hicks, who&#8217;s in communications with Facebook, and he said there was a power failure at one of their data centres this morning, but everything is back to normal now. That&#8217;s pretty fast &#8212; not the server repair, but the PR response. Impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/29/facebook-appears-to-be-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google investors get another gut check</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/28/google-investors-get-another-gut-check/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/28/google-investors-get-another-gut-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/28/google-investors-get-another-gut-check/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those Google guys &#8212; they&#8217;re a nice bunch, and smart as all get out, but when it comes to dealing with investors they could probably use a few tips. For example, when your stock is selling for more than 80 times earnings, and you have a market value of over $110-billion (U.S.), don&#8217;t use the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F28%2Fgoogle-investors-get-another-gut-check%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F28%2Fgoogle-investors-get-another-gut-check%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Those Google guys &#8212; they&#8217;re a nice bunch, and smart as all get out, but when it comes to dealing with investors they could probably use a few tips. For example, when your stock is selling for <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=GOOG">more than 80 times</a> earnings, and you have a market value of over $110-billion (U.S.), don&#8217;t use the words &#8220;growth is slowing.&#8221; Ever. Why? Because then your share price will get creamed, as Google&#8217;s did on Tuesday, when chief financial officer George Reyes <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060228.wgoogle0228/BNStory/Business/home">did exactly that</a> at a Merrill Lynch conference on Internet advertising (which accounts for about 90 per cent of Google&#8217;s revenue).</p>
<p>Specifically, the Google executive was quoted by CNBC as saying: &#8220;Growth is slowing and now largely organic&#8230; the search monetization gains have now been largely realized.&#8221; Did he say that the company was going down the tubes? No. But when you&#8217;re growing as quickly as Google has been &#8212; and your stock is predicated on that growth continuing &#8212; admitting that growth is slowing down even a little is tantamount to yelling &#8220;Sell!&#8221; Which is <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG">what investors did</a>: Google was down by more than $50 or about 13 per cent in early trading, which wiped about $14.5-billion off the company&#8217;s market capitalization in a matter of hours (former analyst and tech-stock lightning rod Henry Blodget has <a href="http://www.internetoutsider.com/2006/02/google_cfo_said.html">more here</a> and also <a href="http://www.internetoutsider.com/2006/02/okay_now_we_do_.html">here</a>).</p>
<p>By mid-afternoon, the stock had rebounded to trade at $373, which meant it was only down by about 4.5 per cent from Monday&#8217;s close &#8212; but clearly some investors were rattled. It&#8217;s been a tough couple of months for the search kingpin: although Google&#8217;s stock price has come back from its lows of a couple of weeks ago, it is still down by more than 20 per cent from its peak of $475 <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=GOOG&#038;t=3m">earlier this year</a>. And Mr. Reyes&#8217; comments didn&#8217;t help the rest of the Internet sector either &#8212; shares of Amazon, Yahoo and eBay were all down as well on Tuesday. </p>
<p>While the Google exec&#8217;s comments may not have been news (at least not to anyone who looked at the company&#8217;s financial results from the most recent quarter) they seem to have come as a surprise to some investors. And they could make them increasingly nervous about the stock going forward. As my friend Paul Kedrosky notes, it&#8217;s not so much that Google doesn&#8217;t give guidance, it&#8217;s that <a href="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/002726.html">they suck at it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/28/google-investors-get-another-gut-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

