<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scribd: Cool feature or actual business?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/19/scribd-cool-feature-or-actual-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/19/scribd-cool-feature-or-actual-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/19/scribd-cool-feature-or-actual-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it&#8217;s kind of quaint to wonder about business models with Web 2.0 companies, and a number of people (including Fred Wilson) have argued that startups shouldn&#8217;t worry about monetization until they get some scale, but I have to say that I felt that old twinge of concern when I first saw Scribd, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F02%2F19%2Fscribd-cool-feature-or-actual-business%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F02%2F19%2Fscribd-cool-feature-or-actual-business%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I know it&#8217;s kind of quaint to wonder about business models with Web 2.0 companies, and a number of people (including Fred Wilson) have argued that startups shouldn&#8217;t worry about monetization until they get some scale, but I have to say that I felt that old twinge of concern when I first saw Scribd, which just re-launched with <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/19/scribd-ipaper/">a new format and features</a>, including its own Flash-based document viewer. I think the service is great, but the business angle kind of makes me wonder.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question that Scribd is pretty cool &#8212; especially when you consider that it was created by a couple of twentysomethings through the Y Combinator startup program run by programmer and VC Paul Graham. There&#8217;s a video of co-founder Trip Adler <a href="http://us.intruders.tv/Trip-Adler-of-Scribd-YouTube-for-documents_a197.html">here,</a> in which he looks like the next-door neighbour&#8217;s kid, the one you get to look after the cats and maybe mow the lawn while you&#8217;re away.</p>
<p>Trip and his team are clearly smart as well, since they ditched Adobe&#8217;s Flashpaper, which they were using initially, in favour of their own Flash viewer called iPaper &#8212; which appears to be faster, has a smaller footprint and has a <a href="http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/scribd-ipaper-embed-documents-web-pages-make-money/2314/">bunch of custom features</a>. It&#8217;s pretty cool to be able to view what looks like a PDF document with images and everything, in an embedded Flash widget. And it&#8217;s easy to implement on your site so that links to Word documents or PDFs <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/02/great-online-document-viewer-gets-even.html">are autoconverted</a>.</p>
<p>All that said though, I just can&#8217;t see how Scribd makes money, even though the service does include <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/19/scribd-steps-up-its-game-with-ipaper/">the ability to put ads</a> on document pages. I don&#8217;t see that being a huge revenue generator (although I could be wrong). I suppose there could be tiers of access to documents or sharing features, but I have no idea what those might be, or whether people would actually pay for them. Maybe Scribd could get bought by Google &#8212; I think Google Docs could use a few of those cool features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/19/scribd-cool-feature-or-actual-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

