<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; docs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/docs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Look ma, my docs are in the cloud!</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/look-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/look-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to see that Google has finally launched offline access for Google Documents &#8212; or at least for text documents anyway (apparently presentations and spreadsheets are coming later). I guess we should be grateful, although I still have to wonder why Zoho has had offline capability for its document-sharing service since way back in November [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F03%2F31%2Flook-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F03%2F31%2Flook-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Nice to see that Google has finally launched offline access for Google Documents &#8212; or at least for text documents anyway (apparently presentations and spreadsheets <a href="http://googledocs.blogspot.com/2008/03/bringing-cloud-with-you.html">are coming later</a>). I guess we should be grateful, although I still have to wonder why Zoho has had offline capability for its document-sharing service since way back in <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/11/26/zoho-writer-where-the-hell-is-google/">November sometime</a>, which is based on Google Gears. I thought having inside knowledge of features helped companies triumph over their competitors &#8212; or is that the kind of thing that only works for Microsoft?</p>
<p>Late to the party or not, I still think Google is the one to beat. Zoho&#8217;s services are great, and I use Zoho Show in particular a fair bit, but when it comes to trusting a company with my data I would have to come down on the side of Google. Doesl being a multibillion-dollar company mean that they won&#8217;t be <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/02/15/what-happens-when-the-cloud-is-down/">vulnerable to outages</a> that take down the cloud? Hardly. But I expect them to have some pretty mean backups and redundancies, thanks to those 600,000 servers they have in warehouse farms around the world (or however many they are up to now).</p>
<p>Some &#8212; including <a href="http://www.lastpodcast.net/2008/03/31/google-docs-now-available-offline-through-gears/">Frederic of The Last Podcast</a> &#8212; say the sharing part of Google Docs doesn&#8217;t interest them much, and that they need features that only an offline or desktop version of a word processor can offer. I have to say I don&#8217;t need the latter, and I think the former is a critical feature, especially as companies try to make it easier for their employees to collaborate and become more creative. (Note: Rafe Needleman at Webware <a href="http://www.webware.com/8301-1_109-9906648-2.html">points out that</a> Mozilla is planning to build this feature into its browser).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/03/31/look-ma-my-docs-are-in-the-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise: No one&#8217;s heard of Google Docs</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/18/surprise-no-ones-heard-of-google-docs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/18/surprise-no-ones-heard-of-google-docs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/18/surprise-no-ones-heard-of-google-docs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So a survey by NPD shows that only a tiny fraction of people have ever heard of Web-based document management tools such as Google Docs, and an even tinier fraction have ever used them. Does this really surprise anyone? Joe Wilcox at Microsoft Watch says &#8220;RIP, Web 2.0 Office Suite&#8221; &#8212; but given the title [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F12%2F18%2Fsurprise-no-ones-heard-of-google-docs%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F12%2F18%2Fsurprise-no-ones-heard-of-google-docs%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>So a survey by NPD shows that only a tiny fraction of people <a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/web_services_browser/rip_the_web_20_office_suite.html">have ever heard of</a> Web-based document management tools such as Google Docs, and an even tinier fraction have ever used them. Does this really surprise anyone? Joe Wilcox at Microsoft Watch says &#8220;RIP, Web 2.0 Office Suite&#8221; &#8212; but given the title of his blog, that&#8217;s hardly surprising either. Presumably, Joe would like us to believe that the Web is no threat to Microsoft, that Live Office will rule the world, and so forth.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember when no one had ever heard of Firefox? I do. It&#8217;s still a relatively small proportion of the browsers out there, but it&#8217;s growing. Anyone remember when Facebook was virtually unknown outside university campuses? I do. Obviously, Google Docs is no Facebook &#8212; but the phenomenon of Web-based document management is not a fad, and I think it&#8217;s a little early in the game to be <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/18/majority-of-americans-on-google-docs-what-you-talkin-bout-willis/">writing obituaries</a> for something that has only been around for a year or so.</p>
<p>So a majority of people <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2007/12/17/study-73-of-americans-have-never-heard-of-google-docs/">have never heard</a> of Google Docs, and are happy to use Microsoft Office for everything. So what? A majority of people still search in vain for the &#8220;any&#8221; key on their keyboard when installing software. What does that prove? Nothing. Microsoft will likely continue to dominate the office software market, just as it does the OS market &#8212; but that&#8217;s not where <a href="http://searchengineland.com/071218-090302.php">the action is</a>, and not where the future is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/12/18/surprise-no-ones-heard-of-google-docs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

