<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; decentralization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/decentralization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter: the decentralization debate</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/11/twitter-the-decentralization-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/11/twitter-the-decentralization-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decentralization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=2411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate over whether Twitter has become so important a form of communication that it should be standardized &#8212; and thereby removed in some sense from the company that created it &#8212; has been going on for awhile now, and recently reared its head again on the Gillmor Gang, the podcast run by tech guru [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F05%2F11%2Ftwitter-the-decentralization-debate%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2008%2F05%2F11%2Ftwitter-the-decentralization-debate%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The debate over whether Twitter has become so important a form of communication that it should be standardized &#8212; and thereby removed in some sense from the company that created it &#8212; has been going on for awhile now, and recently <a href="http://blog.echovar.com/?p=385">reared its head again</a> on the Gillmor Gang, the podcast run by tech guru Steve Gillmor. As described by blogger Chris Gerrish, the discussion focused on how a more decentralized Twitter-style &#8220;micro-blogging&#8221; standard could effectively take over from the service, something <a href="http://blog.echovar.com/?p=385">Gerrish calls</a> &#8220;A Venezuelan moment,&#8221; in what I assume is a reference to Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez and his various nationalization schemes.</p>
<p>I wrote about this <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/05/does-twitter-need-to-be-killed-or-fixed/">awhile back</a>, and many people scoffed at the idea that Twitter was important enough to be having these kinds of conversations, although Marc Canter has compared it to <a href="http://blog.broadbandmechanics.com/2008/05/decentralized-twitters-time-has-come">the domain name system</a> that powers the Internet, and Dave Winer has said he&#8217;s afraid that losing Twitter could be like losing Web pages from the early days of the Internet (although he <a href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/05/11/whyDecentralizingTwitterIs.html">has praised</a> Gerrish&#8217;s post).</p>
<p>A couple of fascinating side-points to this debate: The first is Steve Gillmor&#8217;s long and (in classic Gillmor style) rambling and fundamentally disjointed guest <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/11/the-blood-brain-barrier/">post on TechCrunch</a> about this debate, in which he compares Twitter and &#8220;the cloud&#8221; to the blood-brain barrier (incorrectly, according to one commenter) and compares Yahoo to Hillary Clinton, then closes with a quote from a Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young song. One commenter <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/11/the-blood-brain-barrier/#comment-2289438">calls it</a> &#8220;lazy, badly-written, undergraduate nonsense,&#8221; while another refers to it as &#8220;possibly the worst TechCrunch post ever.&#8221; As Joel Spolsky has written in the past, Steve Gillmor is not an easy guy to understand even <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/12/23.html">at the best of times</a>.</p>
<p>The other interesting thing is a comment made on Gerrish&#8217;s post by none other than Blaine Cook, the former chief technology architect at Twitter, who recently departed the company in what became a <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/04/23/amateur-hour-over-at-twitter/">controversial exit</a>. In addition to saying that he built the service&#8217;s &#8220;track&#8221; feature in just 12 hours, Cook suggests that <a href="http://blog.echovar.com/?p=385#comment-445750">allowing other services</a> to &#8220;federate&#8221; or integrate with Twitter&#8217;s features wouldn&#8217;t be difficult at all. Could Twitter become a kind of micro-blogging standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/11/twitter-the-decentralization-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

