<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; calgary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/calgary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iStockPhoto of Calgary gets bought by Getty</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/10/istockphoto-of-calgary-gets-bought-by-getty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/10/istockphoto-of-calgary-gets-bought-by-getty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calgary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[getty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istockphoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2006/02/10/istockphoto-of-calgary-gets-bought-by-getty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who says there&#8217;s no Web-buyout action going on in the Great White North? It may not compare with Yahoo buying Flickr or del.icio.us in terms of visibility, but in the world of downloadable stock photography, iStockPhoto.com &#8211; based in my former home town of Calgary, Alberta &#8211; has been one of the early stars, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F10%2Fistockphoto-of-calgary-gets-bought-by-getty%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2006%2F02%2F10%2Fistockphoto-of-calgary-gets-bought-by-getty%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Who says there&#8217;s no Web-buyout action going on in the Great White North? It may not compare with Yahoo buying Flickr or <a href="http://del.icio.us" title="http://del.icio.us" target="_blank">del.icio.us</a> in terms of visibility, but in the world of downloadable stock photography, <a href="http://iStockPhoto.com" title="http://iStockPhoto.com" target="_blank">iStockPhoto.com</a> &#8211; based in my former home town of Calgary, Alberta &#8211; has been one of the early stars, and so it&#8217;s interesting to find out that they <a href="http://seattle.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2006/02/06/daily26.html">have been acquired</a> by stock photo giant Getty Images for about $50-million (U.S.). Thanks to <a href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/getty-images-buys-istockphoto.html">Thomas Hawk</a> for pointing that one out. </p>
<p>Along with Corbis (owned by Bill Gates), Getty is one of the largest players in the industry. If you see a classic or iconic shot in a newspaper or magazine or on a website, there are good odds it belongs to <a href="http://creative.gettyimages.com">Getty</a>. There&#8217;s more information on the buyout at an online photo magazine called <a href="http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001994651">Photo District News Online</a>, and much discussion at <a href="http://www.stockphototalk.com/phototalk/2006/02/my_prediction_w.html">StockPhotoTalk</a>, run by Andy Goetze, who mentioned a rumour that Getty would buy iStockPhoto in <a href="http://www.stockphototalk.com/phototalk/2006/01/swiss_image_dis.html">a post</a> three weeks ago.</p>
<p>According to the reports, Getty will continue to operate <a href="http://iStockPhoto.com" title="http://iStockPhoto.com" target="_blank">iStockPhoto.com</a> as a separate unit, run by iStockPhoto CEO Bruce Livingstone and about 30 employees (a nice payout for them). As far as I can tell, this is one of the first signs that the world of big, expensive, global stock-photo companies such as Getty and Corbis has started to pay attention to the small, inexpensive, Web-distributed model being pursued by iStockPhoto, <a href="http://Fotolia.com" title="http://Fotolia.com" target="_blank">Fotolia.com</a> and others. </p>
<p>As Thomas Hawk mentions <a href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/getty-images-buys-istockphoto.html">in his post</a>, imagine what Yahoo could do if it started trying to monetize some of the photos in Flickr. And if you want to explore this topic further, Alan Meckler of <a href="http://Jupitermedia.com" title="http://Jupitermedia.com" target="_blank">Jupitermedia.com</a> &#8211; which also owns a stock-photo company &#8211; has <a href="http://weblogs.jupitermedia.com/meckler/archives/013701.html">some thoughts here</a>, and StockAsylum notes that Getty is trying to <a href="http://www.stockasylum.com/text-pages/articles/a6wn022006-istockgettwo.htm">soothe the ruffled feathers</a> of its professional photographer suppliers, who might think it is going down-market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/02/10/istockphoto-of-calgary-gets-bought-by-getty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

