<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; bombs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/bombs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Banning search is double-plus good</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/10/banning-search-is-double-plus-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/10/banning-search-is-double-plus-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/10/banning-search-is-double-plus-good/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the European Union &#8212; not exactly a bastion of sound decision-making on a whole range of issues &#8212; comes the novel idea of banning or blocking searches for dangerous words such as &#8220;bomb.&#8221; EU Justice and Security Commissioner Franco Frattini says that he intends to explore with the private sector how to &#8220;prevent people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F09%2F10%2Fbanning-search-is-double-plus-good%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathewingram.com%2Fwork%2F2007%2F09%2F10%2Fbanning-search-is-double-plus-good%2F&amp;source=mathewi&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>From the European Union &#8212; not exactly a bastion of sound decision-making on a whole range of issues &#8212; comes the novel idea of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSL1055133420070910">banning or blocking searches</a> for dangerous words such as &#8220;bomb.&#8221; EU Justice and Security Commissioner Franco Frattini says that he intends to explore with the private sector how to &#8220;prevent people from using or searching dangerous words like bomb, kill, genocide or terrorism.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this is a brilliant idea. Why didn&#8217;t anyone think of it before? It&#8217;s so simple. But I don&#8217;t think it goes far enough. Why not ban the <strong>actual words themselves</strong> instead? That would be much more effective. Then people not only couldn&#8217;t search for things like bombs or killing, they wouldn&#8217;t be able to write about them either &#8212; and eventually, they wouldn&#8217;t even be able to <em>think</em> about them, because the concepts themselves wouldn&#8217;t exist!</p>
<p>Double-plus good, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/09/10/banning-search-is-double-plus-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

