<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; balance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/tag/balance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Finding a balance in social media</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/14/finding-a-balance-in-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/14/finding-a-balance-in-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/14/finding-a-balance-in-social-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laurent Haug, a very smart guy and part of the brain trust behind the LIFT conference in Geneva, has written a great post on his blog about finding balance in social media, and how he thinks that we are beginning to do that &#8212; in other words, stepping back from the &#8220;all users are created [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="left" src='http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/snipshot_e4j8jrecvt4.jpg' alt='snipshot_e4j8jrecvt4.jpg' />Laurent Haug, a very smart guy and part of the brain trust behind the LIFT conference in Geneva, has written <a href="http://www.ballpark.ch/blog/english/866/experts-driver-and-users">a great post on his blog</a> about finding balance in social media, and how he thinks that we are beginning to do that &#8212; in other words, stepping back from the &#8220;all users are created equal&#8221; view that has driven some of the commentary around sites like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a> and <a href="http://digg.com">Digg</a> and acknowledging that some people actually might have skills or qualifications that make them more valuable. Not exactly a revelation for some, perhaps (yes, I mean you Seth) but still worth saying. As Laurent puts it at one point: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Kicking out the experts was not the answer. We do not all contribute the same value. Somebody who has carved violins all his life should have more editing power than me on Wikipediaâ€™s Stradivarius page.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Laurent goes on to talk about how he sees social media and online communities that generate content being made up of three necessary groups: the <strong>users</strong>, content creators who are &#8220;needed to scale the system to a dimension where it starts to matter;&#8221; the <strong>drivers</strong>, who &#8220;build the community framework,&#8221; and the <strong>experts</strong>, who &#8220;bring credibility to the whole edifice by sharing their extensive knowledge.&#8221; Go <a href="http://www.ballpark.ch/blog/english/866/experts-driver-and-users">read the whole thing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/14/finding-a-balance-in-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PayPerPost &#8212; just as bad as ever</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/02/payperpost-just-as-bad-as-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/02/payperpost-just-as-bad-as-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payperpost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/02/payperpost-just-as-bad-as-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only is PayPerPost &#8212; the company that pays bloggers to write about advertisers &#8212; still around, but now it has raised a pile of money to boot, from some gullible VCs. Apparently the founders have decided to ignore all the free advice they got last time around about how they should probably require bloggers [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is PayPerPost &#8212; the company that pays bloggers to write about advertisers &#8212; still around, but now it has raised <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2006/10/unrepentant_pay.html">a pile of money</a> to boot, from some gullible VCs. Apparently the founders have decided to ignore all the free advice they got last time around about how they should probably require bloggers to disclose their <a href="http://blog.cymfony.com/2006/07/payperpostcom_l.html">conflict of interest</a>, but then that probably isn&#8217;t surprising given what the founders said back when the subject <a href="http://blog.payperpost.com/2006/07/deal-with-disclosure.html">came up</a>.</p>
<p>In what was a strangely convoluted argument that kind of made my head hurt, the PayPerPost blog argued that forcing people to disclose actually made their posts <i>worse</i> because:</p>
<blockquote><p>they use disclosure as an excuse to create less compelling content. These are people who just think of the service as &#8220;payola&#8221; and don&#8217;t put much effort into their posts. They will meet the minimum requirements but aren&#8217;t necessarily interested in the topic they are writing about.</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, it made them worse from a marketing point of view. But the hard part for me is that the posts we&#8217;re talking about <i>are</i> payola  &#8212; although the PayPerPost people would obviously like you to think that all those bloggers chose to receive money for things that they were already going to blog about positively anyway because they just love those products so much, gosh darn it. </p>
<p>Yeah right. And obviously, disclosing that you&#8217;re getting paid for something will make it seem less authentic, which will make it resonate less with readers (although it might still give them some Google juice, as Scoble <a href="http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/10/02/gaming-google/">points out</a>). That&#8217;s why they don&#8217;t want to do it. When it gets right down to it, PayPerPost and its advertisers are counting on their ability to pull one over on blog readers, because that&#8217;s the only way their idea has even a chance of actually accomplishing anything.</p>
<p>And it does no good to argue, <a href="http://www.scripting.com/2006/10/02.html#whyPayperpostIsBetter">as Dave Winer does</a>, that lots of so-called &#8220;journalism&#8221; is full of that kind of payola &#8212; including tech reviews, sports reporting and travel writing, to name just a few. That doesn&#8217;t make it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/02/payperpost-just-as-bad-as-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
