<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mathewingram.com/work &#187; Dell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/category/dell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stupid lawyer tricks, part two</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/15/stupid-lawyer-tricks-part-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/15/stupid-lawyer-tricks-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 03:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/15/stupid-lawyer-tricks-part-two/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to get on a rant against lawyers or anything (see previous post about Avvo being sued), but I couldn&#8217;t help mentioning the little brouhaha Dell got into recently with the Consumerist blog, after a lawyer for the company company wrote the website an email asking them to take down one of their posts &#8212; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to get on a rant against lawyers or anything (see previous post about Avvo being sued), but I couldn&#8217;t help mentioning the little brouhaha Dell got into recently with the Consumerist blog, after a lawyer for the company company wrote the website an email asking them to <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/backend/dell-demands-takedown-of-our-22-confessions-of-a-former-dell-sales-manager-269127.php">take down one of their posts</a> &#8212; specifically, <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/insiders/22-confessions-of-a-former-dell-sales-manager-268831.php">this post</a>, which contained 22 suggestions from a former Dell employee about how to get good deals and/or good service. I encourage you to <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/insiders/22-confessions-of-a-former-dell-sales-manager-268831.php">read the whole thing</a> and email it to your friends.</p>
<p><img class="left" src='http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/snipshot_e4pt1ajvq9k.jpg' alt='snipshot_e4pt1ajvq9k.jpg' />In the letter, which is quoted verbatim on Consumerist, Tracy Holland of Dell says that the spot in question <em>&#8220;contains information that is confidential and proprietary to Dell,&#8221;</em> and that this is <em>&#8220;in violation of his or her employment agreement and confidentiality obligations.&#8221;</em> As I was reading, I imagined the editor of Consumerist reading the letter and wondering &#8220;and all this relates to me how exactly?&#8221; Which is pretty much what the lawyer for the blog said<a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/backend/dell-demands-takedown-of-our-22-confessions-of-a-former-dell-sales-manager-269127.php"> in her response</a>: <em>&#8220;We came by this material entirely legally: we were provided it by a third party voluntarily, we did not use any improper means to solicit any Dell employee to breach any agreement he may have had with you.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>One of the funny parts is when the Dell lawyer sends a second email at about 2 a.m., saying <em>&#8220;Thank you. Note, though, it has been almost nine hours since we made the request, yet the posting is still up.&#8221;</em> In her response, the Consumerist lawyer starts with: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Despite some suggestions to the contrary among some of our fellow beings, most humans need to sleep. Some of us also receive hundreds of emails a day and have to deal with every one of them. I received this email at 12am last night. It is 7am now. That&#8217;s a pretty good turnaround.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Hilarious. I have a feeling my friend Lionel Menchaca, the head blogger at Dell &#8212; who we had on a panel at <a href="http://www.meshconference.com">mesh</a> a couple of weeks ago and who is a wonderful guy, and the architect of Dell&#8217;s successful blogger outreach program &#8212; would cringe if he read any of that exchange. <b>Update:</b> In fact, Lionel has cringed (or at least it reads that way) and has responded with a mea culpa <a href="http://direct2dell.com/one2one/archive/2007/06/16/18397.aspx">here</a>. Much props to him for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/06/15/stupid-lawyer-tricks-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell and Ubuntu: it&#8217;s all about the drivers</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/01/dell-and-ubuntu-its-all-about-the-drivers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/01/dell-and-ubuntu-its-all-about-the-drivers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 01:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/01/dell-and-ubuntu-its-all-about-the-drivers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Dell has given some more details on its plan to fulfill one of the top 10 wishes of the people who submitted ideas to its Digg-style IdeaStorm site: It&#8217;s going to start shipping Dells that have the Ubuntu flavour of Linux preloaded on them. Regardless of what you think of the move, I think [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Dell has given some more details on its plan to fulfill one of the top 10 wishes of the people who submitted ideas to its Digg-style IdeaStorm site: It&#8217;s going to <a href="http://direct2dell.com/one2one/archive/2007/05/01/13147.aspx">start shipping</a> Dells that have the <a href="http://ubuntu.com">Ubuntu</a> flavour of Linux preloaded on them. Regardless of what you think of the move, I think it&#8217;s pretty amazing that Dell has given its fans a forum like IdeaStorm, and &#8212; more importantly &#8212; has actually listened to them.</p>
<p><img class="left" src='http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/ubuntu.png' alt='ubuntu.png' />Naturally, the Ubuntu announcement has caused plenty of cheers in the Linux camp, since the release from Mark Shuttleworth&#8217;s <a href="http://www.canonical.com/">Canonical</a> is seen by many as the new standard-bearer for the Windows replacement vanguard (Michael Robertson&#8217;s <a href="http://www.linspire.com">Linspire</a>, formerly known as Lindows, also had some early potential, as did <a href="http://www.xandros.com">Xandros</a> and Novell&#8217;s <a href="http://www.novell.com/linux/">Suse</a>). And I have to say that having Ubuntu pre-loaded on a Dell machine would help with one thing: namely, finding drivers that work for all the various hardware inside a brand new machine, especially if it&#8217;s something fancy like a Media Center.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if Michael Dell &#8212; who is a Ubuntu user, as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/01/dell-set-to-offer-pre-loaded-ubuntu-within-weeks/">Engadget notes</a> &#8212; has had any of the same problems that I have, but I&#8217;ve been trying for days to get Ubuntu&#8217;s latest release running on an HP Media Center, and have had no luck. It installs fine, and loads and I get the nice Evolution desktop that comes with <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeistyFawn">Feisty Fawn</a> (as the new release is called, following the Linux &#8220;goofy name&#8221; rule). But the network card doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Let me note that I am not some Linux noob. I&#8217;ve installed and run Suse 8, 9 and 10 as well as Debian and Xandros and three or four other flavours of Linux. I have personally edited the <a href="http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/archive/index.php/t-20510.html">x86config file</a> and added mode lines by hand to get an LCD monitor working, and have SSH&#8217;ed into my Debian box remotely using putty and repaired my MySQL tables. So there. </p>
<p>Ubuntu can&#8217;t recognize the Intel network chip, no matter what I do. I&#8217;ve edited the modules file, installed various add-ons. Nothing. Intel has a Linux driver &#8212; but you have to <a href="http://downloadmirror.intel.com/df-support/2896/ENG/README.txt">compile it yourself</a> and add it to the Linux kernel, and that&#8217;s a little too close to brain surgery for yours truly. Give me a box with it all pre-installed, and I would be a pretty happy camper. If there&#8217;s one thing Windows does pretty well, it&#8217;s the drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/05/01/dell-and-ubuntu-its-all-about-the-drivers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell&#8217;s new marketing video &#8212; WTF?</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/26/dells-new-marketing-video-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/26/dells-new-marketing-video-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mathew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jibjab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/26/dells-new-marketing-video-wtf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just for the record, I think it&#8217;s great when a company has some fun with things, shakes things up a bit, lets its hair down (fill in your favourite metaphor here). But at the same time, I think a company with some image problems &#8212; like say&#8230; oh, I don&#8217;t know, like Dell, for example [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, I think it&#8217;s great when a company has some fun with things, shakes things up a bit, lets its hair down (fill in your favourite metaphor here). But at the same time, I think a company with some image problems &#8212; like say&#8230; oh, I don&#8217;t know, like Dell, for example &#8212; might want to make sure that if it spends a bunch of dough on an <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOAunpk54PA">attempt to be funny</a>, that it is a) actually funny and b) funny. The video clip that Michael Dell introduced at OracleWorld doesn&#8217;t qualify.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOAunpk54PA"><img src="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/dell%20--%20jibjab.JPG" alt="dell -- jibjab" /></a></center></p>
<p>In fact, as almost everyone who has seen it seems to agree, it is mind-numbingly bad. Not just un-funny, but cringe-inducingly un-funny &#8212; like say, your grandmother dressing like 50 Cent and trying to do a rap about adult diapers. What was Dell trying to do with this video? It isn&#8217;t aimed at consumers, because it&#8217;s all about proprietary standards. It&#8217;s clearly aimed at suppliers &#8212; specifically, aging suppliers with no sense of humour, or taste for that matter.</p>
<p>Not only is it un-funny in the worst way, it&#8217;s also about five times too long for a self-deprecating joke video (Nick Douglas <a href="http://www.valleywag.com/tech/michael-dell/did-dell-hire-jibjab-to-handle-advertising-209954.php">will pay you</a> if you sit through the whole thing). If the guys behind JibJab.com &#8212; whose style this imitates &#8212; were involved in this clip in any way, they should do themselves and everyone else a favour and go directly to Hell (Note: one of the founders responded in my comments to say they weren&#8217;t involved). And Larry Ellison should sue.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b></p>
<p>My friend Stuart said that howlingly lame videos like this are made all the time for supplier-type conferences, and that it wasn&#8217;t really designed for regular people to see &#8212; to which I replied that the lesson here is, in the age of YouTube, everything will eventually be seen, whether you want it to or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2006/10/26/dells-new-marketing-video-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
