<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Rupert Murdoch stupid like a fox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/11/14/is-rupert-murdoch-stupid-like-a-fox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/11/14/is-rupert-murdoch-stupid-like-a-fox/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael_Josefowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/11/14/is-rupert-murdoch-stupid-like-a-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-374007</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael_Josefowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4864#comment-374007</guid>
		<description>What sounds sensible to me is Rupert trying to squeeze Microsoft, Yahoo and Google for some money. As you say there is not a lot for him to lose.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I think there is another issue that might also be in play.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on the successes of Murdoch&#039;s papers, it&#039;s pretty clear the has little regard for the news, at least in terms of making money.  Putting to one side his purchase of the WSJ, his other &quot;news&quot; outlets are dedicated to gathering tribes of true believers. Fair and balanced at Fox News is a joke, but I think the joke is not on Rupert. He has a dedicated niche fan base that tunes in regularly. it&#039;s a definable niche easily sold to the brands that wish to speak to that niche.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I read recently that 60% of newspaper publishers are seriously considering pay walls around their &quot;news.&quot; This makes sense to me in that the paywall is actually a clear filter for their fans. The business model is to sell stuff to your fan base. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The news for a profit is what fills the space between the advertising and keeps the fans coming back for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sounds sensible to me is Rupert trying to squeeze Microsoft, Yahoo and Google for some money. As you say there is not a lot for him to lose.  </p>
<p>But I think there is another issue that might also be in play.  </p>
<p>Based on the successes of Murdoch&#39;s papers, it&#39;s pretty clear the has little regard for the news, at least in terms of making money.  Putting to one side his purchase of the WSJ, his other &#8220;news&#8221; outlets are dedicated to gathering tribes of true believers. Fair and balanced at Fox News is a joke, but I think the joke is not on Rupert. He has a dedicated niche fan base that tunes in regularly. it&#39;s a definable niche easily sold to the brands that wish to speak to that niche.</p>
<p>I read recently that 60% of newspaper publishers are seriously considering pay walls around their &#8220;news.&#8221; This makes sense to me in that the paywall is actually a clear filter for their fans. The business model is to sell stuff to your fan base. </p>
<p>The news for a profit is what fills the space between the advertising and keeps the fans coming back for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael_Josefowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/11/14/is-rupert-murdoch-stupid-like-a-fox/comment-page-1/#comment-365171</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael_Josefowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4864#comment-365171</guid>
		<description>What sounds sensible to me is Rupert trying to squeeze Microsoft, Yahoo and Google for some money. As you say there is not a lot for him to lose.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I think there is another issue that might also be in play.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on the successes of Murdoch&#039;s papers, it&#039;s pretty clear the has little regard for the news, at least in terms of making money.  Putting to one side his purchase of the WSJ, his other &quot;news&quot; outlets are dedicated to gathering tribes of true believers. Fair and balanced at Fox News is a joke, but I think the joke is not on Rupert. He has a dedicated niche fan base that tunes in regularly. it&#039;s a definable niche easily sold to the brands that wish to speak to that niche.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I read recently that 60% of newspaper publishers are seriously considering pay walls around their &quot;news.&quot; This makes sense to me in that the paywall is actually a clear filter for their fans. The business model is to sell stuff to your fan base. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The news for a profit is what fills the space between the advertising and keeps the fans coming back for more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sounds sensible to me is Rupert trying to squeeze Microsoft, Yahoo and Google for some money. As you say there is not a lot for him to lose.  </p>
<p>But I think there is another issue that might also be in play.  </p>
<p>Based on the successes of Murdoch&#39;s papers, it&#39;s pretty clear the has little regard for the news, at least in terms of making money.  Putting to one side his purchase of the WSJ, his other &#8220;news&#8221; outlets are dedicated to gathering tribes of true believers. Fair and balanced at Fox News is a joke, but I think the joke is not on Rupert. He has a dedicated niche fan base that tunes in regularly. it&#39;s a definable niche easily sold to the brands that wish to speak to that niche.</p>
<p>I read recently that 60% of newspaper publishers are seriously considering pay walls around their &#8220;news.&#8221; This makes sense to me in that the paywall is actually a clear filter for their fans. The business model is to sell stuff to your fan base. </p>
<p>The news for a profit is what fills the space between the advertising and keeps the fans coming back for more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

