Comments on: Gawker, the WaPo and the death of journalism http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:14:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: guodan http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-4/#comment-358415 guodan Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:55:21 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-358415 <a href="http://www.2uaj.com/Air_Jordan_20.html" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 20</a> <br><a href="http://www.2uaj.com/Air_Jordan_21.html" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 21</a> Air Jordan 20
Air Jordan 21

]]> By: guodan http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-4/#comment-358414 guodan Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:53:30 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-358414 <a href="http://www.2uaj.com/Air_Jordan_16.html" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 16</a> <br><a href="http://www.2uaj.com/Air_Jordan_17.html" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 17</a> Air Jordan 16
Air Jordan 17

]]> By: Absolutereturn http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-4/#comment-358362 Absolutereturn Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:22:19 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-358362 Hello,<br><br>Nice post I Like your site very well and continue to do so. Hello,

Nice post I Like your site very well and continue to do so.

]]> By: MaryAlan http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-4/#comment-358308 MaryAlan Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:14:16 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-358308 This is a really interesting debate. I've gone through and read the original Post article, and I read The Gawker blog post in question. In my opinion, The Gawker did nothing wrong by quoting the Post article extensively. The most obvious point which proves The Gawker article was not plagiarised -- The author used large quotation marks to distinguish unoriginal content from original content! This is a really interesting debate. I've gone through and read the original Post article, and I read The Gawker blog post in question. In my opinion, The Gawker did nothing wrong by quoting the Post article extensively. The most obvious point which proves The Gawker article was not plagiarised — The author used large quotation marks to distinguish unoriginal content from original content!

]]> By: Should news site charge for ad-free experience | Save the Media http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-2/#comment-357161 Should news site charge for ad-free experience | Save the Media Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:12:28 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-357161 [...] or quoting as copyright infringement may see this as a bonus. Consider the recent hullabaloo over Gawker liberally quoting from a Washington Post piece. I don’t see it as a bonus. I see it as newspaper missing out on the major benefit of [...] [...] or quoting as copyright infringement may see this as a bonus. Consider the recent hullabaloo over Gawker liberally quoting from a Washington Post piece. I don’t see it as a bonus. I see it as newspaper missing out on the major benefit of [...]

]]>