Comments on: Gawker, the WaPo and the death of journalism http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/ ... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Gawker, el Washington Post y el fin del periodismo http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-2/#comment-379375 Gawker, el Washington Post y el fin del periodismo Wed, 26 May 2010 19:55:38 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-379375 [...] respuesta de la blogosfera anglosajona no se ha hecho esperar. Mathew Ingram le responde que Gawker enlaza a la fuente tres veces en el post y la cita por su nombre pero que esto no parece [...] [...] respuesta de la blogosfera anglosajona no se ha hecho esperar. Mathew Ingram le responde que Gawker enlaza a la fuente tres veces en el post y la cita por su nombre pero que esto no parece [...]

]]> By: guodan http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-2/#comment-358415 guodan Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:55:21 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-358415 <a href="http://www.2uaj.com/Air_Jordan_20.html" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 20</a> <br><a href="http://www.2uaj.com/Air_Jordan_21.html" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 21</a> Air Jordan 20
Air Jordan 21

]]> By: guodan http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-2/#comment-358414 guodan Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:53:30 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-358414 <a href="http://www.2uaj.com/Air_Jordan_16.html" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 16</a> <br><a href="http://www.2uaj.com/Air_Jordan_17.html" rel="nofollow">Air Jordan 17</a> Air Jordan 16
Air Jordan 17

]]> By: Absolutereturn http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-2/#comment-358362 Absolutereturn Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:22:19 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-358362 Hello,<br><br>Nice post I Like your site very well and continue to do so. Hello,

Nice post I Like your site very well and continue to do so.

]]> By: MaryAlan http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/08/02/gawker-the-wapo-and-the-death-of-journalism/comment-page-2/#comment-358308 MaryAlan Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:14:16 +0000 http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4705#comment-358308 This is a really interesting debate. I've gone through and read the original Post article, and I read The Gawker blog post in question. In my opinion, The Gawker did nothing wrong by quoting the Post article extensively. The most obvious point which proves The Gawker article was not plagiarised -- The author used large quotation marks to distinguish unoriginal content from original content! This is a really interesting debate. I've gone through and read the original Post article, and I read The Gawker blog post in question. In my opinion, The Gawker did nothing wrong by quoting the Post article extensively. The most obvious point which proves The Gawker article was not plagiarised — The author used large quotation marks to distinguish unoriginal content from original content!

]]>