<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An iTunes for news? Dumb, dumb, dumb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/12/an-itunes-for-news-dumb-dumb-dumb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/12/an-itunes-for-news-dumb-dumb-dumb/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: An iTunes for news Dumb dumb dumb &#124; Hammock Stand</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/12/an-itunes-for-news-dumb-dumb-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-351499</link>
		<dc:creator>An iTunes for news Dumb dumb dumb &#124; Hammock Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4053#comment-351499</guid>
		<description>[...] An iTunes for news Dumb dumb dumb   Posted by root 20 minutes ago (http://www.mathewingram.com)        Rex hammock i guess i should have been clearer the itunes store is what i meant blog comments powered by disqus older post fred wilson and the power of comments feel free to leave a comment or use the contact form to send me an email get smart with the th        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; An iTunes for news Dumb dumb dumb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An iTunes for news Dumb dumb dumb   Posted by root 20 minutes ago (<a href="http://www.mathewingram.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathewingram.com</a>)        Rex hammock i guess i should have been clearer the itunes store is what i meant blog comments powered by disqus older post fred wilson and the power of comments feel free to leave a comment or use the contact form to send me an email get smart with the th        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | An iTunes for news Dumb dumb dumb [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Printed Matters &#187; Paywall madness: Dec. 2008 - Feb. 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/12/an-itunes-for-news-dumb-dumb-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-345734</link>
		<dc:creator>Printed Matters &#187; Paywall madness: Dec. 2008 - Feb. 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4053#comment-345734</guid>
		<description>[...] 12, 2009 - 9:50 pm An iTunes for news? Dumb, dumb, dumb by Mathew [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 12, 2009 &#8211; 9:50 pm An iTunes for news? Dumb, dumb, dumb by Mathew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewspaperProject: a wobbly kickoff &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab &#187; Pushing to the Future of Journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/12/an-itunes-for-news-dumb-dumb-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-345539</link>
		<dc:creator>NewspaperProject: a wobbly kickoff &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab &#187; Pushing to the Future of Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4053#comment-345539</guid>
		<description>[...] believe it or not, David Carr&#8217;s &#8220;Let&#8217;s Invent an i-Tunes for News.&#8221; (Yes, that one.)  We won&#8217;t read about the next newspaper bankruptcy at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] believe it or not, David Carr&#8217;s &#8220;Let&#8217;s Invent an i-Tunes for News.&#8221; (Yes, that one.)  We won&#8217;t read about the next newspaper bankruptcy at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/12/an-itunes-for-news-dumb-dumb-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-374215</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4053#comment-374215</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Ted -- I hope you are right  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Ted &#8212; I hope you are right  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tshelton</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2009/01/12/an-itunes-for-news-dumb-dumb-dumb/comment-page-1/#comment-374214</link>
		<dc:creator>tshelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=4053#comment-374214</guid>
		<description>The frighteningly obvious problem for newspapers is that print advertising is not working as well as other option open to advertisers and so they are going elsewhere with their dollars at the same time that print distribution isn&#039;t working as well as other options for readers and so they too are going elsewhere... But why save newspapers?  If the only constituents left who want to save the newspaper are journalists, than I think you have put your finger squarely on the problem (and solution).  Its time for journalists to start getting very entrepreneurial and think outside the advertising box as the revenue source for supporting in-depth reporting, investigative journalism, and foreign news desks.  As I wrote in my response to David Byrne on this topic -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://tedshelton.blogspot.com/2009/01/more-news.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tedshelton.blogspot.com/2009/01/more-new...&lt;/a&gt; -- I believe that we are quickly moving into a world of MORE news -- and higher quality news as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The frighteningly obvious problem for newspapers is that print advertising is not working as well as other option open to advertisers and so they are going elsewhere with their dollars at the same time that print distribution isn&#39;t working as well as other options for readers and so they too are going elsewhere&#8230; But why save newspapers?  If the only constituents left who want to save the newspaper are journalists, than I think you have put your finger squarely on the problem (and solution).  Its time for journalists to start getting very entrepreneurial and think outside the advertising box as the revenue source for supporting in-depth reporting, investigative journalism, and foreign news desks.  As I wrote in my response to David Byrne on this topic &#8212; <a href="http://tedshelton.blogspot.com/2009/01/more-news.html" rel="nofollow">http://tedshelton.blogspot.com/2009/01/more-new&#8230;</a> &#8212; I believe that we are quickly moving into a world of MORE news &#8212; and higher quality news as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

