<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do brands belong on Twitter? Yes and no</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/12/13/do-brands-belong-on-twitter-yes-and-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/12/13/do-brands-belong-on-twitter-yes-and-no/</link>
	<description>... at the intersection of media, technology, business and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Young</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/12/13/do-brands-belong-on-twitter-yes-and-no/comment-page-1/#comment-374765</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3792#comment-374765</guid>
		<description>Good idea however if the big box companies are doing this with marketing in mind then they should recruit affiliates who will let people know about these new products coming online so it can be kept to a personal touch and this will help the little guy make a living. Does this sound like a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea however if the big box companies are doing this with marketing in mind then they should recruit affiliates who will let people know about these new products coming online so it can be kept to a personal touch and this will help the little guy make a living. Does this sound like a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Young</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/12/13/do-brands-belong-on-twitter-yes-and-no/comment-page-1/#comment-351434</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3792#comment-351434</guid>
		<description>Good idea however if the big box companies are doing this with marketing in mind then they should recruit affiliates who will let people know about these new products coming online so it can be kept to a personal touch and this will help the little guy make a living. Does this sound like a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea however if the big box companies are doing this with marketing in mind then they should recruit affiliates who will let people know about these new products coming online so it can be kept to a personal touch and this will help the little guy make a living. Does this sound like a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/12/13/do-brands-belong-on-twitter-yes-and-no/comment-page-1/#comment-344774</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3792#comment-344774</guid>
		<description>Mark,&lt;br&gt;I agree with your post. Twitter, like the Millenial generation it primarily caters to, is about a dialogue in the back channel and not one-way communications.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve seen tech company CEOs who simply think of Twitter as a very short press release. Unless it&#039;s an engaging, varied and relevant discussion, people will tune it out pretty quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />I agree with your post. Twitter, like the Millenial generation it primarily caters to, is about a dialogue in the back channel and not one-way communications.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve seen tech company CEOs who simply think of Twitter as a very short press release. Unless it&#39;s an engaging, varied and relevant discussion, people will tune it out pretty quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMNT Links of the Week #7 &#124; Old Media, New Tricks</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/12/13/do-brands-belong-on-twitter-yes-and-no/comment-page-1/#comment-344708</link>
		<dc:creator>OMNT Links of the Week #7 &#124; Old Media, New Tricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3792#comment-344708</guid>
		<description>[...] Ingram, a blogger at The Globe and Mail, writes about whether brands really, really belong on Twitter. He mentions @ColonelTribune and @Statesman, of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ingram, a blogger at The Globe and Mail, writes about whether brands really, really belong on Twitter. He mentions @ColonelTribune and @Statesman, of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewi</title>
		<link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/12/13/do-brands-belong-on-twitter-yes-and-no/comment-page-1/#comment-344678</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mathewingram.com/work/?p=3792#comment-344678</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s definitely a risk, Bernie -- but then, so is being on the Internet at all  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s definitely a risk, Bernie &#8212; but then, so is being on the Internet at all  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

